THE THREE AMENDMENTS …on the Tennessee November Ballot …a Brief Explanation

by Ralph Bristol, Oct. 13, 2026 - 

Amendment 1 — Denying bail for serious crimes

Currently, Tennessee's Constitution generally guarantees bail before trial except in capital cases.

This amendment would allow judges to deny bail for additional serious offenses, including terrorism, second-degree murder, aggravated rape and crimes requiring offenders to serve at least 85% of their sentences.

Amendment 2 — Prohibiting state property taxes

Tennessee currently has no statewide property tax, but the legislature retains the authority to impose one.

This amendment would permanently prohibit a state property tax unless voters subsequently changed the Constitution.

County and municipal property taxes would be unaffected.

Amendment 3 — Expanding crime victims' rights

Known as Marsy's Law, this amendment would expand constitutional protections for crime victims.

Among other things, victims would have stronger rights to receive information about proceedings, participate in parole hearings, receive notice of prisoner releases and have their safety considered in release decisions.

NOTE: An amendment must receive more YES votes than NO votes, and its YES votes must exceed half the total votes cast in the governor's race.

Ralph Bristol is the former long-time morning talk radio host broadcasting on Supertalk 99.7 WTN. He was one of the less provocative and bombastic of conservative radio personalities, more thoughtful and grounded in conservative ideas. He left talk radio in 2018 and retired. He lives in Nashville. 

Rod's Comment: These three proposed amendments will be on the Tennessee November 3rd ballot. Please vote yes on all three. To read the full text of the amendments, follow this link. 

Top Stories

Cartoon of the Day: Nothing Says 'Pro-life' Quite Like Celebrating a Televised Execution

 

Top Stories

My Favorite Cartoon of the Day: Burn Those Books.

 

Top Stories

Grade fixing scandal in Nashville. Heads Need to Roll.

by Rod Williams, Oct, 11, 2026- My bandwidth for outrage has been so consumed by Trump's authoritarian actions, his corruption, insane policies, and his clownish behavior that I haven't had much left over for other outrageous things happening elsewhere. However, we have a major outrage here at home that, if it has not grabbed your attention, needs to. If you are not familiar with what I am referring to, rather than try to explain it myself, I am reposting the Bing AI summary below:

Recent reports describe two major, related issues in Metro Nashville Public Schools (MNPS) — a state-led civil-rights probe at Stratford High School and whistleblower allegations from a former teacher about grade fabrication.

1. Stratford High School civil-rights investigation
State officials have opened a Tennessee Department of Education civil-rights probe into alleged grade and credit manipulation at Stratford High School republicannation.com.

• A former assistant principal, Dr. Howard Jones, told investigators he found students credited for classes not on the school’s master schedule and grades boosted to help them graduate republicannation.com.

• Media reviews cited transcripts showing credits for courses a student did not attend in a given year republicannation.com.

• Past internal files at Stratford documented sharp grade lifts in a credit recovery program, sometimes from the 50s/60s into the 90s, and a “contract” approach grading on effort rather than mastery republicannation.com.

• The district says it reviewed the claims, found no proof, and maintains students must demonstrate mastery before credit recovery. It is cooperating with the investigation republicannation.com.
  Investigators will compare schedules, attendance, teacher-of-record lists, and system logs to determine if grades were altered improperly republicannation.com.

2. Teacher whistleblower: Samira Hardcastle
Former MNPS teacher Samira Hardcastle, a 2025–26 “Teacher of the Year,” resigned after claiming district leaders asked her to fabricate a grade for a student whose parent demanded a change NewsChannel 5 Nashville+1.

• Hardcastle said the issue involved a missing art project; she refused to alter the failing grade, but the principal later changed it after reviewing late work republicanjournal.org.

• She argued this undermined teacher authority and encouraged poor student behavior WPLN News.

• MNPS denies broader grade manipulation, stating the change was based on principal review of late work and was not “for the purpose of producing a particular final course grade” NewsChannel 5 Nashville+1.

• Hardcastle has called for an audit of MNPS and linked the case to concerns about inflated graduation rates NewsChannel 5 Nashville.

3. Broader context and implications
Both cases touch on grade integrity, parental pressure, and systemic incentives. The Stratford probe is part of a state effort to ensure student rights and academic standards, while Hardcastle’s resignation highlights tensions between teacher autonomy and administrative discretion republicannation.com+1.
The district’s responses emphasize policy compliance and lack of evidence for wrongdoing, but the investigation and whistleblower claims have drawn public and political attention republicannation.com+1.

What’s next

• The state probe will likely produce formal interviews, records audits, and possible findings on whether grades were altered improperly republicannation.com.

• Hardcastle’s case may lead to public board discussions and possibly a financial or policy review if lawmakers act on her recommendations NewsChannel 5 Nashville.

• Both situations remain under scrutiny, with no final conclusions yet.

Key takeaway: The Nashville grade-fixing controversy involves documented allegations of credit manipulation at one school and a high-profile teacher resignation over suspected grade fabrication, with the state and district in the midst of reviews and disputes over evidence and policy republicannation.com+2.

This should not be swept under the rug. Heads need to roll. People need to be fired.  At every opportunity, the mayor, council members, and school board members need to be asked about this. There needs to be high-profile council investigations, and politicians should not be allowed to pass the buck or weasel out of addressing this. The guilty need to be held accountable.

I am behind the curve myself in what actions are being taken, but I am going to be monitoring this much more closely. If Metro cannot correct this, then the State needs to aggressively intervene. 

Top Stories

My Favorite Cartoon of the Day: Russian Diesel.

 

Top Stories

Referendum Language for Fairgrounds Racing Ban Gets Approved as Petition Tactics Face Scrutiny.

by Megan Podsiedlik, The Pamphleteer, Oct. 9, 2026- The Charter Revision Commission approved the ballot language for a referendum to ban racing at the Fairgrounds Nashville during a brief meeting yesterday. As of now, the measure can move forward if the Election Commission verifies that the petition in relation to the referendum has enough valid signatures. If all hurdles are cleared, the referendum would appear on next year’s ballot, giving Nashville voters the chance to decide the fate of racing at the historic Fairgrounds.

“There's not anything that can be said that's going to sway us one way or the other because what we have to do is basically just approve the ballot,” said Commission Chair Dewey Branstetter. The chair went on to explain that the commission’s role is simply "ministerial” before opening up public comment.

Jon Cooper, an attorney with Holland & Knight representing Decline to Sign, which opposes the proposed ban on racing at the fairgrounds, acknowledged that the referendum language clearly outlines the ban but questioned the validity of the petition process. 

“We have multiple examples of canvassers throughout the process misleading voters to get signatures by saying that Metro had already decided to tear down the racetrack and that this is going to get affordable housing in its place,” said Cooper. “I’ve submitted to Mr. Kyle, for the record, approximately one hour of video footage showing multiple instances of these falsehoods.”

John Spraggins, a local attorney and president of Care for Nashville, a group supporting the referendum, argued that the video should be stricken from the record. “That’s not really relevant to what this commission is considering today,” he said.

Councilmember Olivia Hill raised concerns about voter clarity after being approached four separate times to sign the petition.

“Each time I was approached [they] said, ‘Hey, would you like affordable housing in Nashville?’ and I said, ‘Sure!’” explained Hill. “And they're like, ‘Just sign this petition.’”

“I understand that your duty today is very ministerial in nature, but I do think it's one of the first steps during this entire process where something has been made crystal clear and truthful to the voters of Nashville,” said MNPS School Board member and former Metro Council member Zach Young, reiterating that the referendum would only end auto racing at the fairgrounds.

For funsies, Chair Branstetter asked legal counsel what would have happened if the commission had rejected the referendum language. Legal explained that the body would have been required to provide its exact reasoning. “And then we'd end up in Chancery Court on the other end,” said Branstetter, underscoring the justification for the body’s decision.

Top Stories

Trump Tariffs Caused a 2.9 Percent Increase in the Price of Many Everyday Item and Also Raises the Prices of Domestically Produced Goods, Federal Reserve Study Finds

by Rod Williams, Oct. 8, 2026 - It amazes me that many people still believe the exporting country pays tariffs when goods are imported into the United States. They do not. No matter how often President Trump says or implies they do, they simply do not. The importer pays the tariff. The importer could be a wholesaler who then sells his imported goods to a retailer, or a large company that imports and retails. In any event, when the retailer sells goods to the consumer, he passes on the tariff. 

Now, the wholesaler or the retailer may "eat" some of the tariffs. That is, they may lower their profit margin, or find cost savings elsewhere to avoid passing on the full cost of the tariffs. Also, the producer of the product or the exporter may lower the price at which they sell their product to the importer. So while a 100% of the tariff may not be added to the retail price, most of it is.  A recent study published by the New York Federal Reserve found that "a 10 percent increase in the duty rate pushes up import prices by 9.2 percent" (link page 10). So, 92% of the tariff is passed on to the consumer.

One thing people often don't think about or realize is that even if you buy goods made in America, increased tariffs raise the cost of those goods too. The study explains:

Tariffs also affect the prices of goods made in the U.S. This happens in two ways. First, many U.S. producers rely on imported parts and materials, so tariffs raise their cost of production. For example, a tariff on steel makes it more expensive to build a car in the U.S. We refer to this effect as the marginal cost channel. Second, when tariffs make imported goods more expensive, U.S. producers of competing goods face less pressure to keep their own prices down. We refer to this effect as the strategic complementarity channel. We find evidence that U.S. producers increased their prices at the factory gate because of both channels, and the marginal cost effect is the larger of the two.

This same study also found that President Donald Trump's tariff policies were responsible for keeping prices elevated across 67 categories of consumer goods. The research estimated that these items cost 2.9 percentage points more as of February 2026 due to the tariffs. 

The Consumer Price Index measures price changes over time. While there is a definition of inflation that is broader than prices increasing over time, for people who are not academic economists, it is fair to say the CPI measures inflation. There are other indexes that try to do the same, such as the Producer Price Index, but the most relied upon is the CPI. The CPI is produced by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The BLS collects about 80,000 prices monthly from retail stores, service establishments, car dealers, doctors' offices, divorce lawyers, funeral homes, and almost every price that is part of a legal market transaction. I worked for the Consumer Price Index for several years and was a field officer collecting those prices. The prices are weighted to represent a typical urban market basket of goods. So, while you may purchase only one divorce and one funeral in your lifetime, you probably purchase milk and bread every week. The BLS has a bunch of statisticians and economists who figure out how to calculate the weights of the items in the basket. The U.S. Consumer Price Index (CPI) classifies all expenditure items into 8 major groups, which are further broken down into more than 200 detailed item categories. 

The recent Federal Reserve of New York study found that of the CPI's 200-plus categories of goods and services, the cost of 67 categories of goods was 2.9 percentage points higher as of February, thanks to Trump tariffs. It is a fact: tariffs are causing price increases. 

To read the full report, follow this link. 

Top Stories

 

Top Stories

Communist or Trump? The Game Show.

 

Top Stories

Where does the Government Obtain the Authority to Kill a Person Who is no Longer Poses an Immediate Threat

Michael Dioguardi

by Michael Dioguardi, Facebook, Oct. 1, 2026 - I oppose it on the Lockean delegation principle.

John Locke grounds legitimate government in the collective delegation of our natural right of self-defense. But that right permits the use of force to stop an unjust threat. It does not give an individual the authority to kill someone who has already been restrained and no longer poses an immediate threat. If government possesses only those coercive powers that individuals may legitimately delegate to it, then the death penalty appears to exceed that delegated authority.

Frédéric Bastiat reinforces this principle by describing government as the collective exercise of the individual right of lawful defense. Its legitimate function is therefore to protect each person’s natural rights to life, liberty, and property, rather than to exercise an independent power to initiate force against people who no longer pose a threat.

That is why I am less interested in opposing the death penalty on consequentialist grounds. My objection is more fundamental: I do not think the authority to execute can be derived from the limited authority individuals possess over one another in a free society.

The problem for those who want to apply this principle selectively is that it does not stop with the death penalty. Once you take seriously the proposition that government authority is limited to powers individuals can legitimately delegate, much of the interventionist state becomes difficult to justify. You cannot invoke the delegation principle when it produces a preferred conclusion and then set it aside when applying it would constrain taxation, regulation, redistribution, licensing, or other exercises of coercive government power.

That leaves you with a scattered collection of arguments about the death penalty, each attacking a different question: deterrence, retribution, incapacitation, proportionality, morality, and so forth. Those arguments may be worth debating individually, but they largely avoid the more fundamental question of where the government obtains the authority to kill a person who is no longer an immediate threat.

Michael Dioguardi is a residential property manager and independent blogger writing under the title Seeker of Liberty. Drawing on years of dedicated study of the U.S. Constitution, the Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers, landmark court decisions, and Austrian School economics, he analyzes contemporary challenges to individual liberty, institutional accountability, and economic stability. Michael resides in Nashville. 

#

The above essay is in response to an essay opposing the death penalty written by Mark Rogers. To see Mark Rogers essay and my comments on the death penalty, follow this link.

Top Stories

It is Time to End the Death Penalty

Mark Rogers

by Mark Rogers, Facebook, Oct. 1, 2026 -  How many more examples of unnecessary cruelty will Tennessee provide before the People demand an end to the stupid and wasteful use of the death penalty? Not only is the death penalty lousy public policy, but apparently, the Volunteer state can't even do it properly. 

It shouldn't be necessary to reiterate all the reasons the death penalty should be consigned to the ash heap of History but... as a public service...

1) The death penalty cannot be undone. The discovery of new evidence or the exposition of false evidence or the realization that police or prosecutors played fast and loose with the facts can't be redressed with an official "Ooopsie" and a large check. Mistakes are final. 

2) The death penalty prevents criminals from changing their lives and improving their worlds even from prison. I would think people who want law to reflect Christian Values would prefer a system that allows for criminals to come to Christ rather than die unchanged. 

3) The death penalty is applied unfairly. Poor and minority killers are far more likely to be sentenced to death than well-off white killers. The idea that the death penalty is Justice is a myth. 

4) The death penalty is not a measurable deterrent to future criminals. 

5) The ultimate argument for the death penalty is revenge. Revenge isn't Justice. Revenge isn't good public policy. Revenge at the price of an innocent life isn't the behavior of a Just or Good society. 

How many more innocent people need to die to satiate the lust of some people for 'revenge,' especially when they weren't harmed? How many more people who never had a chance in life must die for the same reason?

Mark Rogers has long been active in Republican Party politics and is an astute observer of political trends and events and Republican politics.  He is well known as a successful Republican campaign manager and political consultant. He has also served in government and the non-profit sector. He is currently exiled from the Republican Party. He lives in Nashville.

#

Comments by Rod Williams -I have changed my mind about the death penalty. I have been of the view that some crimes or so horrendous that the death penalty was justified, but I now think the death penalty should be abolished.  I find Mark Rogers's arguments above persuasive. 

In addition to the above arguments, I have changed my mind because it can take 30 years to carry out the sentence. Some people die on death row of natural causes, never executed. Sometimes the family of the victim dies before the sentence is carried out. If justice were swift, I would be less opposed. Rather than the family of the victim waiting thirty years for justice, and experiencing delay after delay, and the State and those opposing the carrying out of the sentence spending thirty years in court fighting over the carrying out of the sentence, would it not be better to just sentence the person to life in prison without the possibility of parole? I think it would.

Another reason I have become an opponent of the death penalty is because of the failure to successfully carry it out.  The State attempted to carry out the execution of Christa Pike on Wednesday night. She was given two doses of pentobarbital by injection, but her heart did not stop. The Knoxville Federal Public Defender’s Office immediately filed for a stay of execution; it was granted, and life-saving measures were administered to Pike.

This is the second botched execution in Tennessee this year. I cannot understand why it is so hard to kill someone. People die of accidental overdoses all the time. Since apparently there is a reason the process of ending a person's life is so difficult, I think it is cruel and inhuman to attempt the execution, fail, administer lifesaving treatments to save the life of the criminal, and then try again later. 

The Christa Pike story is horrendous. It was senseless murder carried out by young people ages 17 and 18. Pike killed another girl for trying to steal her boyfriend and then bragged about the killing and carried a piece of the girl's skull in her pocket as a souvenir. There is no excusing or justifying the murder or minimizing the evil that occurred. To read more about the case, follow this link. 

Top Stories

Charlie Hatcher Distances Himself from Trump, Scrubs Trump from His Campaign Materials

by Rod Williams, Sept. 29, 2026 - Across the nation, Republican candidates running for office in the midterm elections are trying to distance themselves from President Donald Trump. They are scrubbing references and images of Donald Trump from their websites, campaign materials, fundraising letters, and emails. Many are hoping Donald Trump does not come to their district to campaign for them.

Former Tennessee Agriculture Commissioner Charlie Hatcher, who is running for Congress in Tennessee's fifth Congressional district, has changed his campaign slogan to remove a reference to President Donald Trump.

His former campaign slogan read “Pro-Gun. Pro-Life. Pro-Trump,” and appeared at the bottom of his campaign website. But the logo featuring the slogan has been removed from the website and fundraising emails. The slogan has been changed to read, "Pro-Gun, Pro-Life, Pro-Tennessee." 

It appears his campaign is panicking as he faces an incredibly strong challenge from Columbia Mayor Chaz Molder. Hatcher is running in a district Trump would have won by 20+ points, and yet polling shows Molder is within striking distance. 

The shift in Hatcher’s campaign slogan comes as Republicans nationwide grapple with backlash over the increase in gas and diesel prices, higher grocery prices, and inflation. Also, it seems that Trump's outrageous, erratic, and silly behavior and focus on things like the fight over the Kennedy Center and renaming bodies of water are turning people off, when what they think he should be focusing on is the economy. 

 I suspect that five weeks before the election is a little late to pretend you are not a Trumpinista.

Top Stories