Sunday, March 15, 2026

In a World of Andy Ogles, be a Rep. Jeremy Faison.


by Rod Williams, March 14, 2026- A few days ago, our own Congressman Andy Ogles posted the above tweet. It drew national attention. Ogles also recently said he planned to introduce a bill that would ban immigration from certain Muslim countries. And in another X post he said, “Diversity is our weakness” and called for the deportation of even naturalized Muslim Americans. 

On the same day, Andy Ogles posted the above X post, Rep. Jeremy Faison posted the one below. Rep. Faison is a member of the Tennessee House of Representatives representing Cocke County and parts of Hamblen and Jefferson counties in east Tennessee. 

Jeremy Faison is Chairman of the House Republican Caucus, a role he has held since 2019. He is not some dreamy liberal who thinks we can just all hold hands and sing Kumbaya and all is well. He is clear-eyed about the threat of radical Islam. Nevertheless, he realizes it is wrong to judge people by the group to which they belong and that the First Amendment protects freedom of religion. I support the statement of Faison below. 

In a world of Andy Ogles, be a Jeremy Faison.

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Bill Requiring Tennessee to use 'Judea and Samaria' Instead of 'West Bank' Advances

by Rod Williams, March 15, 2026- Have you gotten accustomed to calling the Gulf of Mexico, the Gulf of America, or the Department of Defense, the Department of War?  Me neither, and I refuse to use those terms. If that is not enough for you, now our Tennessee legislature wants us to refer to what the world calls "The West Bank" as "Judea and Samaria." 

House Bill 1446 would require all Tennessee state agencies that use taxpayer dollars for documents, press releases, or official communications to replace the term “West Bank” with “Judea and Samaria.” The bill has passed out of committee and now heads to the Calendar and Rules Committee for its next step in the legislative process.

Read more about it here and see the bill here

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

America needs immigrants as much as they need liberty’s blessings

George F. Will
by George F. Will, Washington Post, March 15, 2026 - Two dissimilar government agencies have inadvertently combined to clarify the immigration debate. Stomach-turning excesses by Immigration and Customs Enforcement have turned many Americans’ abstract political preference into something uncomfortably concrete. And the Census Bureau has demonstrated that the nation needs immigrants as much as they need the blessings of American liberty. ....

...  Prior to the Biden inundation, most undocumented immigrants had arrived before 2010, 43 percent as of 2020 had been here at least 20 years, about one-third were homeowners, and their 5 million children born here were citizens. Talk of sending them “home” is nonsensical.

They are home. For which, give thanks:

The Census Bureau reports that between July 2024 and July 2025, the U.S. population grew by just 0.5 percent, ...  for the first time since relevant census data began being collected in 1850, immigration accounted for the entire U.S. population growth.

As the U.S. population ages, those leaving the workforce enter Social Security and Medicare. The nation’s birth rate is below the replacement rate, so immigration must replenish the workforce whose tax contributions fund the entitlements.

Immigrants are 23.6 percent of STEM (science, technology, engineering, math) workers. Nurses (15.9 percent foreign born) and health aides (28.4 percent foreign born) are crucial to an aging America.

... Immigrants “generated more in taxes than they received in benefits from all levels of government.” They “created a cumulative fiscal surplus of $14.5 trillion in real 2024 US dollars,” including $3.9 trillion in savings on interest that did not need to be paid on debt that was not added.

Immigrants were, on average, more than 12 percent more likely to be employed than the U.S.-born population. Cato: “In 1994, the immigrant share of government expenditures was 18 percent below their share of the population; in 2023, it was 25 percent below.”

In 2023, immigrants constituted almost 18 percent of the civilian labor force, and more than a third of them were in management, professional and related occupations, almost double the 21 percent in service occupations (e.g., hospitality). In 2023, immigrant median household income ($78,700) was slightly above that of U.S.-born households ($77,600).

.... As Cato notes, many illegal immigrants who are employed under borrowed or stolen identities have taxes withheld by employers but are ineligible for many government benefits. And they are less likely than others to file returns in order to claim refunds. This is another reason why Cato says:

Immigrants have created an enormous fiscal surplus for the US government … The $14.5 trillion in savings from immigrants is the equivalent of 33 percent of the total inflation-adjusted combined deficits from 1994 to 2023 without immigrants.” (read it all)

George F. Will (born May 4, 1941) is a Pulitzer Prize-winning American libertarian-conservative columnist and political commentator known for his erudite prose and long association with The Washington Post. He was one of the most respected voices in the conservative movement prior to its Trumpification. 

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Loss of Traditions of Freedom has Happened at Other Times and Places and Could Happen Here

Richard Upchurch
by Richard Upchurch, Facebook, March 15, 2026 -The intricacies and varieties of human motivation---"what makes people tick"--- are always fascinating and especially so when we try to think about public participation and leadership. Pres. Trump has made himself, by means of aptitude and ambition, in our time of vastly enhanced news coverage and public discourse, a powerful and consequential leader on the vast stage of world history, and thereby exemplifies this biographical complexity very well. 

Who can deny what is always and everywhere a part of our human nature---a certain primal urge for dominance in both style and substance that he himself seems to feel no need to deny. He quite openly covets personal power, and succeeds spectacularly in obtaining it, and in every possible way, always obvious and unashamed in enhancing his status and public image as a member of new class of world plutocrats---men who have mastered the new environments of world-wide business and technology to acquire immense amounts of personal wealth, power and in some instances fame and prestige. 

Simply, without skipping a beat, Pres. Trump openly challenges our constitutional order whenever, by doing so, he thinks he can keep and enhance the extraordinary prerogatives he has succeeded in grasping, while at the same time very skillfully presenting himself as firmly on the side of a conservative social agenda with all the trappings and shows of traditional patriotism. 

While at least sometimes seeming to work to gain recognition as a peacemaker and proponent of free institutions, whenever the devotion he covets seems to be waning, or whenever his party and his agenda seem to be losing, he quite openly challenges institutions most basic and most fundamental in our constitution, such as state and local control of election procedures and standards. And, incredibly, a large number of our fellow citizens seem ready to follow him, to respond to his very great oratorical skills, and seem to want to enhance rather than limit his growing power.  

Things similar have happened in societies that seemed advanced and enlightened and seemed to value their constitutional norms but abandoned them to follow a strong leader into dictatorship---most notably in Germany and Italy, in early and mid 20th Century. I think I've read that ours is now the world's oldest democratic republic with a written constitution. Whether Pres. Trump is the originator or the creature of the dangerous urge of so many to follow and yield and to surrender to his ambition (and I believe he is both) our constitution could possibly be set aside in favor of "a strong leader." 

There seem to be some signs that a loyal opposition is having some small hopeful successes, but now is the time for us to be reminded, and reminded again and again, that loss of traditions of freedom has happened at other times and places and could happen here.

Richard Upchurch is a scholar and a philosopher who lives in Nashville.

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Friday, March 13, 2026

Who is Running for Governor and Other Federal and State Offices

The qualifying deadline was for candidates running for the office of Governor, United States Senate, United States House, Tennessee Senate, Tennessee House, Republican State Executive Committee and Democratic State Executive Committee was noon 12:00 noon on Tuesday, March 10, 2026. Political parties have until noon on Tuesday, March 17, 2026, to make determinations regarding the bona fide status of candidates.

These are the candidates running for Governor:


Here is who is running in the 5th Congressional District:


For a complete list of candidates for all of the offices, follow this link.

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

TN Legislature Advances a Bill Requiring a Person Speak English to Obtain a Tennessee Driver's License

by Rod Williams, March 13, 2026 - A bill that would require applicants for a Tennessee driver's license to prove their ability to read English and also require proof of citizenship or permanent residency to register a vehicle advanced in both houses of the legislature this week, passing committees in both houses with overwhelming majorities. 

Why? What problem are they trying to solve? One does not need to speak English to maneuver on the roadways. Traffic signs are almost universal in design. If you can recognize "stop," and "speed limit ..." that is about all you need to know. 

The law does not require foreign tourists to read English to rent a car. It does not prohibit illiterate Americans from driving a car. This is not about roadway safety. It is about bigotry. 


Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Tuesday, March 10, 2026

How Trump Uses His Office to Enrich Himself, Friends, and Family, While Endangering American Security and Pardoning Felons.

National Review, April 2026 Issue, March 10, 2026 - Trump has become one of the world’s richest crypto entrepreneurs, making the Biden family’s $27 million influence- peddling scandal look penny- ante. To pull it off, shortly before the 2024 election he started a crypto enterprise, World Liberty Financial, with Steve Witkoff, his New York real estate pal and current special envoy to the Middle East. 

It was secretly seeded with half a billion dollars from Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed al Nahyan, the deputy to and intelligence chief for his brother Sheikh Mohamed, the king of the United Arab Emirates. Concurrently, WLF— ostensibly 
run by sons Eric Trump and Zach Witkoff— got help building the blockchain infrastructure from Changpeng Zhao. 

Zhao had been convicted of felony money laundering for allowing his crypto 
exchange (Binance, now banned in the U.S.) to become a covert funding channel for “terrorists, cybercriminals, and child abusers,” in the words of the DOJ. When WLF rolled out USD1, its new 
stablecoin (a form of cryptocurrency pegged to the value of the dollar), Tahnoon— whose government was lobbying Trump to pardon Zhao— bought an astonishing $2 billion of the untested coin, 
Investing it in Zhao’s Binance. 

Stablecoin operates like a bank: issuers like WLF invest the purchase proceeds. Trump and Witkoff therefore stand to make $80 million per year from Tahnoon’s purchase. Subsequently, Zhao got his pardon, and the UAE got access to the advanced microchip technology from which Biden security officials and congressional Republicans had blocked it over concerns about Tahnoon’s ties to Beijing. If Democrats take control of the House this fall, expect to hear a lot more about this.

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Are Our Politics, at the Local and State and National Levels Better or similar or Worse Today than 14 Years Ago?

Mark Rogers
by Mark Rogers, reposted from Facebook, March 10, 2026 -This post was written some 14 years ago in response to a series of resolutions from county Republican Party Executive Committees attacking Governor Bill Haslam. 

Are our politics, at the local and state and national levels, better or similar or worse today than 14 years ago? Thoughts? 

There was a time when the Williamson County Republican Party was a role model for Republicans across the state and the nation.  The party elected more and more highly qualified Republicans at every level of government, making the county the best run county in America.  The party did not stop at the county line but extended help to other county parties around the state and contributed thousands of dollars to Republican candidates in key races.  Many of my happiest political memories involve working with the Williamson County Republicans.

That is why it pains me so much to see that the Williamson County Republican Party Executive Committee has apparently taken leave of its senses and chosen to attack Governor Haslam for reasons that would be funny if it were not that so many activists seem to agree with them.  To read the resolution posted in the Tennessean passed by the Stewart County Republican Executive Committee {and similar to those passed in Williamson and other counties} is to grasp the idea of people who are so clueless that they think the Governor is an ally of Islamic radicals, an agent of International Communism, a Democrat and various other Satanic forces.  

The closing line calls for the State Executive Committee to:

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE Stewart      County GOP, that we hereby urge The Tennessee Republican Executive Committee to take meaningful action against the Governor Bill Haslam ‘s Administration.

My suggestion is that the State Executive Committee put these county party executive committees on double secret probation and have some sane people run the party organizations until new elections are held next year.  

Beyond that, the danger of such behavior is not to be underestimated.  Today too many good people in both parties sit back and leave the nuts and bolts of the party to other people who are often members of groups with very narrow agendas.  Such groups often put one issue above everything else.  That ends up allowing noisy minorities to impose their views on a party that represents a wide range of opinions on those issues.  

Today the Republican party is being threatened by a small group of self-styled conservatives who are more interested in their own power than in improving America.  They use the accusation that anyone who disagrees with them is a RINO or a liberal or some other groundless accusation.  

These resolutions are a perfect example of the witch hunting that is beloved of the faux conservatives who are more interested in power than principle.  More interested in shrinking the party to just their followers than in building a durable conservative and Republican majority.  

I encourage Republicans across Tennessee to reject such extremist behavior and rally behind candidates in the primary who embody the Values and Ideas of Ronald Reagan and Howard Baker and George H. W. Bush instead of the ideology of intolerance and division.  

As Thomas Brackett Reed, the last truly great Speaker of the House of Representatives, "A good party is better than the best man who ever lived."  We cannot rebuild the Republican Party to restore America if we allow different groups to impose ideological tests on members.  One cannot be 100% consistent on every Ideal or Right.  So those who want to say that only people who measure up to their definition on their issue are going to destroy the party by constantly dividing us over minor issues.  

Let's focus on where we agree rather than trying to divide the party with such harmful measures as these resolutions.

Rod/s Comment: In answer to your question, our politics are much worse. The Republican Party has morphed from the smart party to the dumb party. We went from a party that believed in free trade, free enterprise, capitalism, belief in a democratic-republican form of government tethered to the Constitution, respect for norms and institutions, balanced budgets, fiscal responsibility, America's leadership role in the world and collective security, an expectation that our leaders not use public office to enrich themselves, to what we have today; a nationalist-populist, blood and soil party that supports might-makes-right and threatens its neighbors, reckless spending, tariffs,  bigotry and celebration of cruelty, disregard for the Constitution and basic liberties enshrined in the Constitution, acceptance of unthought-of corruption, and a party with a Nazi problem.

Of course, the Democratic Party has changed too, embracing wokeness, identity politics, electing avowed socialists to office, and also willing to trample rights and punish incorrect thoughts, and going off on tangents like defund the police.

Fifteen years ago would be 2015. I think that is the year that the Republican Party and the Conservative movement lost its way. My friend Gene Wisdom recently posted a memory from that year in which he attended the CPAC convention. CPAC, as I am sure most people reading this know, is the annual convention of the conservative movement. While the conservative movement has diverse elements, CPAC kept out of the convention the kind of people who now hold center stage at the conference. In 2014 they did not invite Donald Trump to attend the convention. In 2015, they invited him.

In February 2016, National Review, which since its founding had been the most influential magazine of the conservative movement, devoted a whole issue to various luminaries of the conservative movement arguing why Trump was a bad choice for the Republican Party and arguing that Trump was not a conservative. They titled that issue "Against Trump." Some of those who contributed to that issue have since acquiesced to Trump; some are now irrelevant, and a few are still fighting the good fight opposing Trump and his authoritarian agenda. While National Review is still a relevant publication, they no longer have the influence they did in the past. Now the "luminaries" of what has become the conservative movement are podcasters like Megan Kelly, Tucker Carlson, and Candice Owens. Now it would be difficult to find a dozen influential conservatives to oppose Trump. They have either acquiesced, been exiled, or become refugees from the movement. 

I remember well when the Party went off the rails, starting about 2009. I remember well when Governor Haslam was accused of plotting to impose Sharia Law on Tennessee. This would be funny if not for the fact that many in the Republican Party believed it. I recall when a group of Republican House members thought the Haslam administration was building a Muslim foot-washing facility in the Capitol building. It turned out to be a mob sink. You can't make this stuff up.

I wonder where we will go from here. On a good day, I think Trump will fade from the scene, and Republicans will rediscover the things they cast aside, and the Party will return to normal, and we will again have two parties fighting over policy but within the parameters of normal; on a bad day, I think we rolling down hill like a snowball headed for hell. 

Mark Rogers was long been a Republican leader before the Trump era of the Party. He has worked as campaign manager for candidates, a consultant, a political researcher and analyst, and has served in positions of leadership on government commissions and has served on non-profit boards and commissions. He lives in Nashville. 


Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Judge orders ICE to explain detaining Nashville reporter

News Channel 5, March 10, 2026 -A federal judge has ordered the government to explain why Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detained Nashville Noticias reporter Estefany Rodriguez Florez and why she remains held at an Alabama facility. ...

... Attorneys for Rodriguez argue that her rights under the First and Fifth Amendments were violated when ICE agents abruptly detained her.

They’re seeking her immediate release and asking the court to prevent the government from taking any enforcement action against Rodriguez, either by retaliating against her past speech or chilling her future speech.

Her attorneys have said they worry Rodriguez was retaliated against for her reporting on ICE activity throughout Nashville for the Spanish-language outlet Nashville Noticias. They noted that ICE had never been in contact with her until January — roughly five years after she first entered the country legally on a visa in 2021.

.... ICE has accused Rodriguez of illegally overstaying her visa. ...  a pending asylum case, ...  Rodriguez had missed two scheduled meetings. ...

Medina told us that a massive winter storm shut down practically all of Nashville on the same day as the first scheduled meeting. A second meeting in February was also rescheduled when he said ICE officials could not find anything related to a scheduled meeting in their system. (read it all)


Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Monday, March 09, 2026

Trump Officials Attended a Summit of Election Deniers Who Want the President to Take Over the Midterms

by Doug Bock Clark, ProPublica, March 9, 2026- Several high-ranking federal election officials attended a summit last week at which prominent figures who worked to overturn Donald Trump’s loss in the 2020 election pressed the president to declare a national emergency to take over this year’s midterms.

According to videos, photos and social media posts reviewed by ProPublica, the meeting’s participants included Kurt Olsen, a White House lawyer charged with reinvestigating the 2020 election, and Heather Honey, the Department of Homeland Security official in charge of election integrity. The event was convened by Michael Flynn, Trump’s former national security adviser, and attended by Cleta Mitchell, who directs the Election Integrity Network, a group that has spread false claims about election fraud and noncitizen voting

Election experts say that the meeting reflects an intensifying push to persuade Trump to take unprecedented actions to affect the vote in November. Courts have largely blocked his efforts to reshape elections through an executive order, and legislation has stalled in Congress that would mandate strict voter ID requirements across the country.

The Washington Post reported Thursday that activists associated with those at the summit have been circulating a draft of an executive order that would ban mail-in ballots and get rid of voting machines as part of a federal takeover. Peter Ticktin, a lawyer who worked on the executive order and had a client at the summit, told ProPublica these actions were “all part of the same effort.” 

The summit followed other meetings and discussions between administration officials and activists — many not previously reported — stretching back to at least last fall, according to emails and recordings obtained by ProPublica. The coordination between those inside and outside the government represents a breakdown of crucial guardrails, experts on U.S. elections said.

“The meeting shows that the same people who tried to overturn the 2020 election have only grown better organized and are now embedded in the machinery of government,” said Brendan Fischer, a director at the Campaign Legal Center, a nonpartisan pro-democracy organization. “This creates substantial risk that the administration is laying the groundwork to improperly reshape elections ahead of the midterms or even go against the will of the voters.”

Five of six federal officials who attended the summit didn’t answer questions about the event from ProPublica. 

A White House official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said federal officials’ attendance at the gathering shouldn’t be construed as support for a national emergency declaration and that it was “common practice” for staffers to communicate with outside advocates who want to share policy ideas. The official pointed to comments Trump made to PBS News denying he was considering a national emergency or had read the draft executive order. “Any speculation about policies the administration may or may not undertake is just that — speculation,” the official said.

In the past, Trump has expressed an openness to a federal takeover as a way to stem projected Republican losses in November. This month, he said in an interview with conservative podcaster Dan Bongino that Republicans need “to take over” elections and “to nationalize the voting.”

Mitchell did not respond to questions from ProPublica about the summit. A spokesperson for Flynn responded to detailed questions from ProPublica by disparaging experts who expressed concerns, texting, “LOL ‘EXPERTS.’” 

The 30-person roundtable discussion on Feb. 19, at an office building in downtown Washington, D.C., was sponsored by the Gold Institute for International Strategy, a conservative think tank. Afterward, activists and government officials dined together, photos reviewed by ProPublica showed.

Flynn, the institute’s chair, told a social media personality why he’d arranged the event. 

“I wanted to bring this group together physically, because most of us have met online” while “fighting battles” in swing states from Arizona to Georgia, Flynn said to Tommy Robinson on the gathering’s sidelines. Robinson posted videos of these interactions online. “The overall theme of this event was to make sure that all of us aren’t operating in our own little bubbles.”

Flynn has repeatedly advocated for Trump to declare a national emergency and posted on social media after the event addressing Trump, “We The People want fair elections and we know there is only one office in the land that can make that happen given the current political environment in the United States.”

In addition to Olsen and Honey, four other federal officials from agencies that will shape the upcoming elections attended the event. At least four of the six attended the dinner.

One is Clay Parikh, a special government employee at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence who’s helping Olsen with the 2020 inquiry. A spokesperson at ODNI said Parikh had attended the summit “in his personal capacity.” 

Another, Mac Warner, handled election litigation at the Justice Department. A department spokesperson said that Warner had resigned the day after the event and had not received the required approval from agency ethics officials to participate.  

The department “remains committed to upholding the integrity of our electoral system and will continue to prioritize efforts to ensure all elections remain free, fair, and transparent,” the spokesperson said in an email.

A third administration official who attended the summit, Marci McCarthy, directs communications for the nation’s cyber defense agency, which oversees the security of elections infrastructure like voting machines. 

Kari Lake, whom Trump appointed as senior adviser to the U.S. Agency for Global Media, was a featured speaker. Lake worked with Olsen and Parikh in her unsuccessful bid to overturn her loss in the 2022 Arizona gubernatorial election.

Lake said in an email that she “showed up to the event, spoke for about 20 minutes about the overall importance of election integrity, a non-partisan issue that matters to all citizens — both in the United States and abroad. I left without listening to any other speeches.” 

“Elections should be free from fraud or any other malfeasance that subverts the will of the people,” she added. 

At the meeting, activists presented on ways to transform American elections that would help conservatives, according to social media posts and interviews they gave on conservative media, such as LindellTV, a streaming platform created by the pillow mogul Mike Lindell. They said the group broke down into two camps: those who wanted to pursue a more incremental legal and legislative strategy and those who wanted Trump to declare a national emergency.

Multiple activists left the meeting convinced Trump should do the latter, a step they believe would allow the president to get around the Constitution’s directive that elections should be run by states. 

Former Overstock.com CEO Patrick Byrne, a prominent funder of efforts to overturn the 2020 election, told LindellTV that Trump has “played nice” so far in not seizing control of American elections. “But at some point,” Byrne said, “he’s got to do something, the muscular thing: declare a national emergency.”

Byrne responded to questions from ProPublica by sending a screenshot of a poll that he said suggested “2/3 of Americans correctly do not trust” voting machines, which the proposed national emergency declaration aims to do away with.

Will Huff, who has advocated for doing away with voting machines, told a conservative vlogger that Olsen, the White House lawyer, and other administration representatives would take the “consensus” from the gathering back to Trump. “It’s got to be a national emergency,” said Huff, the campaign manager for a Republican candidate for Arkansas secretary of state.

In response to questions from ProPublica, Huff said in an email that Olsen and Trump would use their judgment to decide whether to declare a national emergency. 

“The President has been briefed on findings of shortcomings in election infrastructure,” Huff wrote. “I believe there are steady hands around the President wanting to ensure that any action taken is, first, constitutional and legal, but also backed by evidence.”

McCarthy, the cybersecurity official, expressed more general solidarity with fellow attendees in a post on social media about the summit. “Grateful for friendships forged through years of standing shoulder-to-shoulder, united by purpose and conviction,” she wrote. “The mission continues… and so does the fellowship.”

A LinkedIn post with a photo showing seven people at an upscale restaurant. The post says: “Some nights remind you exactly why you stay in the fight. 🇺🇸

Honored to spend time in the 202 🇺🇸 with General Michael Flynn alongside fellow Patriots — Cleta Mitchell, Holly Kesler, Brad Carver, Heather Honey, Clay Parikh and Mac Warner — who continue to stand for FITness — Faith, Integrity & Trust in our Elections. 🔐

Grateful for friendships forged through years of standing shoulder-to-shoulder, united by purpose and conviction. The mission continues… and so does the fellowship. ❤️🤝🇺🇸.”

Marci McCarthy, second from left, Heather Honey, fourth from right, and Cleta Mitchell, third from right, were among the conservative activists and officials who attended the summit. McCarthy posted about the event on LinkedIn. Screenshot by ProPublica. Redactions by ProPublica.

Last week’s gathering was the latest in a string of private interactions between conservative election activists and administration officials, according to emails, documents and recordings obtained by ProPublica. Many have involved Mitchell’s Election Integrity Network. Before taking her government post, Honey was a leader in the Election Integrity Network, ProPublica has reported, as was McCarthy.

Previously unreported emails obtained by ProPublica show that just weeks after Honey started at the Department of Homeland Security, she briefed election activists, a Republican secretary of state and another federal official on a conference call arranged by her former boss, Mitchell.

“We are excited to welcome her on our call this morning to hear about her work for election integrity inside DHS,” Mitchell wrote in an email introducing presenters on the call.

Honey didn’t respond to questions from ProPublica about the call. Experts said Honey’s briefing gave her former employer access that likely would have violated ethics rules in place under previous administrations, including the first Trump administration — though not this one.

The prior “ethics guardrails would have prevented some of the revolving door issues we’re seeing between the election denial movement and the government officials,” said Fischer, the Campaign Legal Center director. Those prior rules “were supposed to prevent former employers and clients from receiving privileged access.”

This story was originally published by ProPublica.

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Sunday, March 08, 2026

What is the Truth About Nashville Property Tax Hikes?

 


by Rod Williams, March 8, 2026- The mayor is flat-out saying something that is not true. He is smart enough to know it is not true. He knows how property taxes are calculated.  

An increase in property value does not increase the amount of property tax you pay. Let us look at an example:

Assume you have a house valued at $300,000. Residential property is assessed at 25%, so the Assessed value is $300 000 x 25%= $7500.  Then for each hundred dollars of assessment (750) you apply the tax rate, which is $2.814 per $100 of assessed value for the Urban Services District of Nashville. So, your tax bill would be 750 x $2.814 = $2,110.5.

Now, let us assume your property increases in value to $600,000, but also assume all other properties increase in value and this is reflected in the reappraisal. State law requires that, following a reappraisal, the tax rate must be lowered so that there is no increase in tax revenue for the city. A reappraisal is not for the purpose of increasing tax revenue but to ensure fairness and equity in the property tax system by updating property values to reflect their current fair market value. Because real estate market values change over time, with some areas growing faster than others, the periodic reappraisals ensure that property owners pay taxes based on accurate, current data rather than outdated, inequitable values. 

After the appraisal is complete, the city must then pass a "Certified Tax Rate."  This is designed to ensure “truth-in-taxation” following a county-wide reappraisal. The process ensures the amount of total taxes collected for a county remains the same after a reappraisal, even if the combined value of all property in the county rose or fell following the reappraisal.

So let us assume that due to increases in property values, the amount of taxes the city would collect if not for the certified tax rate would double, so the certified tax rate must be cut in half. So, $2.814 x 50%= $1.407. That would be the new tax rate.

Let us assume your home increased in value from $300, 0000 to $600,000. Let us calculate your taxes: ($600,000 x 25%) ÷100 x $1.407= $2110.5

Your tax bill does not change. In reality, what happens is that following the appraisal, the mayor will propose and the Council will pass a new tax rate to bring in more revenue. Most often, the Council will pass the Certified Tax Rate, and then the very next vote will pass a new tax rate higher than the certified tax rate. 

So let us assume the Council passes the Certified Tax Rate and then immediately passes another bill setting the tax rate at $2.00. Your tax bill would be thus: ($600,000 x 25%) ÷100 x $2.00= $3,000. Your taxes went up from the $2110 you were paying to $3,000.  Most will blame it on the increase in property values as reflected in the apprasial and the mayor and the Council may even brag about cutting the tax rate. The truth is, it was not the increase in property values that caused your property bill to increase but the actions of your elected officials.

The mayor knows this. It can be a little more complex than this because different types or properties are assessed at different rates and perhaps, to be generous, the mayor was simply inarticulate, or the quote above was taken out of context. However, I have seen him say something similar elsewhere.  I think he is intentionally trying to mislead. 

It is time to cap property taxes. It is also time to elect a mayor and a Metro Council that will stop imposing higher taxes and be honest and not try to blame increased property taxes on increased property values. 







Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Saturday, March 07, 2026

Why Trump Changed His Mind on Kristi Noem

 by Nick Miroff, Michael Scherer, and Russell Berman, The Atlantic, March 7, 2026- Kristi Noem played “Hot Mama” as the walk-up song for her formal introduction at the Department of Homeland Security headquarters in January 2025. President Trump had put her in charge of his signature campaign promise—the largest mass-deportation campaign in U.S. history—and Noem took a fast, flashy approach to the job. She dressed as a Border Patrol agent and an ICE officer, and rode horseback at Mount Rushmore in ads. She flew to El Salvador and posed in front of a prison cell crammed with tattooed inmates. She made no apologies for aggressive enforcement tactics on American streets, even those that likely broke the law, or for the deaths of two U.S. citizens who opposed her approach.

But it wasn’t the killings of Renee Good and Alex Pretti in Minneapolis earlier this year that finally cost Noem her job today, making her the first ousted Cabinet secretary of Trump’s second term. Instead, it was her self-promotion.

Noem’s standing was already shaky when she went to Capitol Hill to testify this week. On Tuesday, Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana, a Republican, asked whether Trump himself had approved Noem’s $220 million ad campaign that featured her urging migrants to self-deport. Noem said yes, and defended the ads as “effective.”

The ads “were effective in your name recognition,” Kennedy told Noem, saying that she put Trump “in a terribly awkward spot.” He was implying the commission of a cardinal sin for a Trump Cabinet member: seeking to outshine the president. (read more)

Rod's Comment
This is one of the points I made in my essay, "Why I am Cautiously Giddy About the Firing of Kristi Nome."  I wrote, "I suspect Trump is jealous of Noem. Trump wants it all to be about him. He wants to be the center of attention. He resents someone else building a support base and getting attention at his expense.  Calling the two Americans murdered at the hands of ICE, "domestic terrorists" will not get you fired. Being the center of attention will.

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories