Top Stories
A right-leaning disgruntled Republican comments on the news of the day and any other thing he damn-well pleases.
No impulse is more human than wishfulness, the tendency to grasp at any straw that enables us to avert our eyes from difficult realities and put off facing them. Members of America’s national political class personify this failing, in their continuing practice of fiscal denialism. Even as the inexorable arithmetic piles up, those responsible for the nation’s economic future and national security fasten on imaginary miracles to justify a gross default of their duty of stewardship.
A decade ago, as the national debt surged toward the once unthinkable level of $20 trillion (now nearing $40 trillion), denialists took brief refuge in an alchemist fantasy that called itself Modern Monetary Theory. The notion that a nation could borrow without limit, forever, in its own fiat currency was quickly demolished by full-spectrum critiques, in venues ranging from the Cato Institute to the Review of Keynesian Economics. ...
In our post-truth world, facts aren’t as stubborn as they used to be, but the most obstinate of all are the mathematical ones. They tell us not to rely on even the powerfully positive impact of these new technologies to spare us the radical adjustments that a generation of procrastination has now made inevitable.
... What’s not credible is the idea that even an AI-led productivity surge can suffice to offset our decades of dereliction. ... This is no time to be touting miracle cures to justify further procrastination. Until America acts to make major changes in laws on the books, the right side of our national business-plan chart will continue to show a sharp downward line and the label, “Big trouble happens here.” (read it all)
Mitch Daniels is a senior adviser to the Liberty Fund, president emeritus of Purdue University, a co-chair of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget and a former governor of Indiana.
| Mark Rogers |
I do take some issue with Justice Gorsuch on the question of 'culture.' I think that while America was not based on one specific culture, that has more to do with the diversity of cultures within the nations that first came here from Europe. The English brought the cultures of various peoples from the city of London to the moors of Scotland and the forests of Wales and the green fields of Ireland. (For more information on this, read Albion's Seed by David Hackett Fischer.)
Germans came here well before the Revolution from the various states of that area, bringing their own cultures. French Protestants and Catholics were here along with the Spanish and Portuguese.
While all these featured highly individualistic local cultures, all were, at their cores, profoundly shaped by Western Civilization. In that sense, America was dramatically shaped by one culture but one with many faces. And one of the West's greatest achievements by 1787 was the idea that successful nations needed to generally tolerate different cultures and religions.
What America wasn't in its beginning and never has been is the property of one group, not based on birth or religion or language or philosophy. Like Western Civilization itself, America absorbs new People and new Ideas and new Beliefs and moves on while remaining true to our fundamental creedal Ideas.
Right-Wing Influencers Don't Understand What Makes America Great
by Stephanie Slade, Reason, May 9, 2026 -The Dissident Right is furious after Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch told Reason and several other outlets that America is a "creedal nation."
Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch "The Declaration of Independence had three great ideas in it," Gorsuch said in a recent interview with Nick Gillespie. "That all of us are equal; that each of us has inalienable rights given to us by God, not government; and that we have the right to rule ourselves. Our nation is not founded on a religion. It's not based on a common culture, even, or heritage. It's based on those ideas. We're a creedal nation."
... The belief in a "civic" nationalism—the idea that the United States is a "propositional nation," as the Catholic theologian John Courtney Murray put it, rather than one based on blood and soil—is mainstream among Americans of all stripes, including conservatives. ...
.... there are elements of culture that must represent a consensus if the Republic that the Founders bequeathed us is to endure. First and foremost, we need a culture of mutual forbearance, where people want to coexist peacefully even with those who see things differently, and where people take pride in the ideals of human liberty and equal treatment under law, recognizing that America's commitment to those ideals is a large part of what makes it great.
... the Dissident Right, which rejects the very notion of mutual forbearance in favor of a "will-to-power" political approach, doesn't have the answer. You can't save America's culture by sacrificing its creed. (read more)
Mark Rogers has long been active in Republican Party politics and is an astute observer of political trends and events and Republican politics. He is well known as a successful Republican campaign manager and political consultant. He has also served in government and the non-profit sector. He is currently exiled from the Republican Party. He lives in Nashville.
| Ralph Bristol |
I don’t know if this is John’s first commercial, but it’s the first one I’ve seen, and I thought it was pretty good – very positive, highlighting his own qualities and accomplishments, which appear impressive, but for reasons we all know, he just couldn’t help himself.
He had to include a positive statement about President Trump in his commercial. He’s “tough, like Trump,” which he said twice in 30 seconds.
At least he picked one of Trump’s potentially best characteristics, instead of his worst – his economic policies. But his references to Trump significantly detract from the value of his commercial for everyone but Trump’s MAGA base.
So, it’s a matter of mathematics whether the inclusion makes the commercial better or worse, as a campaign tool. Did it win voters or lose them? His pollsters obviously think it will win primary voters.It didn’t necessarily lose me, but it overcame the positive reaction I had to the rest of the commercial.
I haven’t seen Marsha’s first commercial yet. The first ones are always the most positive, and then they start to turn ugly. I know Marsha much better, as a policy maker, than John, and neither leaves a positive policy impression, so I am likely as not to write in a different name for governor, since I have no knowledge of any of the other candidates, and one of these two will almost certainly be the eventual winner.
This interests Boomer Power only in that one of them will be in a position to either help or hurt my mission to control the cost of the federal government, since half of what state governments spend comes from the federal government, which remain in danger of letting its debt create the worst recession the world has ever seen – greater than the Great Depression.
It will be a lot like the Great Depression, except that the world’s people, especially Americans, are MUCH more dependent on government help than they were then. And, that will disappear, because the U.S. government will no longer have access to affordable credit to finance that help – and people will be on their own for the first times in generations.
Both John and Marsha helped usher in the debt that is the greatest single, domestic threat to our nation and our constitution. Unless one of them expresses convincing contrition and persuades me that they can and will spend their gubernatorial terms repairing their damage to our federal budget, I’ll likely be voting for someone else. \
Ralph Bristol is the former long-time morning talk radio host broadcasting on Supertalk 99.7 WTN. He was one of the less provocative and bombastic of conservative radio personalities, more thoughtful and grounded in conservative ideas. He left talk radio in 2018 and retired. He lives in Nashville.
The $2 trillion figure in fiscal year 2026 is up from $1.7 trillion last year. The Office of Management and Budget projects a deficit of $2.065 trillion, primary dealers surveyed by Treasury projected a median of $1.950 trillion and the Congressional Budget Office's February 2026 baseline projected $1.853 trillion.
Will McBride, the Tax Foundation's chief economist, said the numbers show Congress isn't taking action to address financial warnings about the U.S. debt.
"It indicates Congress and the administration are still ignoring the dangers of an unsustainable debt trajectory and actively making it worse rather than addressing it," McBride told The Center Square. "The effect is to make a crisis more likely to happen sooner rather than later."
The projections come from Treasury's quarterly refunding presentation to the Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee, a panel of bond market participants that advises the department on debt management, making them among the most closely watched fiscal disclosures in financial markets.
A bipartisan resolution pending in Congress, House Resolution 981, would set a fiscal target of reducing the federal deficit to 3% of GDP or less by 2030. The measure has drawn support from both parties, with 18 co-sponsors including Rep. Jodey Arrington, R-Texas, Blue Dog Co-Chairs Jared Golden, D-Maine, and Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, D-Wash., and the resolution's lead sponsors, Reps. Bill Huizenga, R-Mich., and Scott Peters, D-Calif.
Huizenga said the 3% target remains the right goal despite the widening gap.
"We've been on the wrong fiscal path for far too long," Huizenga told The Center Square. "The point of the resolution is to get Republicans and Democrats – in Congress, across the federal government, and throughout the private sector – to show agreement and rally around 3% as the most practical, immediate target to address the fiscal crisis."
Arrington, the House Budget Committee chairman, said the nation is "sleepwalking off of a cliff" on its fiscal trajectory.
"The federal deficit has not fallen below 3% of GDP since 2015," Arrington said. "According to current projections, it will continue to exceed 5% of GDP every year for the next three decades. Throughout our history, deficits this large have only appeared in the shadow of wars and economic collapse."
Arrington called for "a combination of discretionary spending discipline, pro-growth economic policies and entitlement reform" to address the problem.
The federal government has not recorded a budget surplus since 2001. Since then, spending has outpaced revenues every year, with deficits ballooning during the COVID-19 pandemic. The fiscal year 2025 deficit was $1.7 trillion, roughly 6% of GDP, and the new Treasury projections suggest fiscal year 2026 will be worse. The last time the federal government ran a deficit below the 3% of GDP threshold proposed in HR 981 was 2015, according to the resolution's own text.
Maya MacGuineas, president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, said the trajectory is alarming.
"$2 trillion deficits used to be unheard of, and then they only occurred during major recessions – it's beyond scary that $2 trillion deficits are now the norm," she said in a statement.
Rep. Scott Peters, D-Calif., said the projections confirm the deficit is heading in the wrong direction.
"Congress needs to change course immediately," Peters told The Center Square, calling on lawmakers to pass his Fiscal Commission Act, which would appoint a bipartisan panel of Democrats, Republicans and independent experts to recommend changes to both taxes and spending to reduce borrowing.
A recent survey by the Peter G. Peterson Foundation found that 92% of voters – including 89% of Republicans, 92% of independents and 94% of Democrats – are concerned the national debt is driving up their personal cost of living. The foundation's U.S. Fiscal Confidence Index fell to a 22-month low of 42 in April, reflecting what the organization described as voters' desire for elected leaders to address the country's fiscal challenges.
"The rising national debt has effectively become a kitchen table issue for Americans because it contributes to rising costs across the economy, from grocery bills to car payments," said Michael A. Peterson, CEO of the Peterson Foundation.
The deficit projections come despite repeated commitments from the administration to address the nation's fiscal trajectory. In a March 2025 address to Congress, President Donald Trump pledged to balance the federal budget for the first time in 24 years. In his February 2026 State of the Union, Trump attributed a potential balanced budget to fraud elimination, saying his administration could balance the budget overnight if it found enough fraud.
The deficit trajectory is compounding the government's debt burden. The federal government spent more than $1 trillion servicing its debt in fiscal year 2025, more than it spent on national defense, and that figure is projected to grow. The national debt passed 100% of GDP in March, according to Treasury data. The Government Accountability Office, the nonpartisan research arm of Congress, warned in April that the nation's fiscal path is "unsustainable" and poses "serious economic, security, and social challenges if not addressed."
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has long acknowledged the deficit problem. Before his confirmation, he publicly championed a "3-3-3" plan that included cutting the budget deficit to 3% of GDP by 2028, and during his January 2025 Senate confirmation hearing testified that federal spending was "out of control." His most recent congressional testimony, delivered April 22, focused on tax cuts and IRS modernization without addressing the deficit trajectory shown in his department's own quarterly refunding documents released two weeks later.
In response to a request for comment, Treasury pointed to economic growth projections and a fraud elimination task force announced in March. The GAO has estimated the federal government loses between $233 billion and $521 billion annually to fraud, based on data for fiscal years 2018 through 2022, a fraction of the projected $2 trillion deficit.
As the gubernatorial primaries draw near, Marsha Blackburn continues to expand her already commanding lead in the Republican primary. Blackburn now garners 63% of the vote, up from 56% in January, giving her a 53-point lead over Congressman John Rose (10%) and a 58-point lead over state Rep. Monty Fritts (5%).
On the Democratic side, the most popular candidate by far is “Not Sure” at 62%, leaving the field wide open. Jerri Green has a slight edge over the rest of the field at 14%, followed closely by Kevin Lee McCants (11%) and Carnita Atwater (8%). While Green currently has only a 3-point lead, she is nearly a 90% favorite to win the primary, according to Polymarket.In this year’s first hypothetical general election matchup for governor, with the candidates chosen based on current Polymarket odds, Senator Blackburn opens with a massive 24-point lead on Democratic frontrunner Jerri Green.
To summarize the piece, property taxes have increased substantially, and some locals are being priced out of the city. A lot of people who live here could not afford to buy here if they did not already own their own home. Local businesses as well as residents are being hit. Unfortunately, the article implies that the problem is not a bloated city government, but that we do not have an income tax. The politician they chose to feature in addressing the issue of Nashville's affordability is woke socialist Rep. Aftyn Behn.
Here is an excerpt:
‘An Existential Crisis’: Residents Pay for Nashville Boom
Claire Jones in Nashville and Ian Hodgson in Washington, Financial Times, Published May 4 2026 -After a long career in show business, Tom Morales was looking forward to leaving Acme Feed & Seed, his Nashville music venue, to his children. But a letter from the city last October changed everything.
Morales’s property taxes had jumped from $129,000 a year to $589,000. “You just open up the envelope and say, ‘What? This can’t be right,’” said Morales. “Having a business you can give to your kids is something you dream about. I was like, ‘Oh my God, I’ve just ruined their lives.’”
“We were thinking it would go up 30, 40 per cent; I could never have imagined it was going to go up 380 or 400 per cent,” added his daughter, Lauren.
Morales is not alone. Nashville has transformed over the past decade as big business and new residents moved in, lured by Tennessee’s zero income tax rate and a booming tourism economy. (read more)
by Mark Rogers, Facebook, May 5, 2026 - For those who foolishly think 'Christian Nationalism' is a liberal myth, here is a prominent Republican media figure named Jenna Ellis who worked in the White House. She is promoting the incredibly unconstitutional (and even more un-American) idea that religious freedom in America only applies to Christians. Mark Rogers
The fact that the Framers didn't specify such an idea should have been more than enough for Ms. Ellis. Her classes in American History in Jr. High and High School, and in college should have educated her. Her class in Constitutional Law should have tipped her off to the stupidity of this position.
But... NO. Here she is endorsing the sort of hateful stupidity that Western Civilization has sought to put behind us since the end of the Wars of Religion in the 17th Century. For 400 years, America and other nations have worked to build pluralistic societies based on Western Ideas. This sort of madness is aimed at reversing that progress.
It would be comforting to think Ms. Ellis was only a freakish outlier, but, sadly, that is not true. More and more we see calls for giving preference to Christianity in law and even enacting laws based on extremist interpretations of Christian Scripture.
And denying equal rights to practitioners of Islam and Hinduism and Buddhism won't be the end. What is to stop these ayatollahs from deciding that Mormonism isn't 'Christian?', or Christian Science? Or Methodism?
People spreading hateful nonsense like this need to be confronted. In today's hyper-partisan America, extremist ideas have a bad habit of finding promoters among con men and cynical opportunists and not bright people who like simple, if really bad, ideas. And then they start spreading... like cancer. Best to introduce the chemo of Truth before they metastasize.
Mark Rogers has long been active in Republican Party politics and is an astute observer of political trends and events and Republican politics. He is well known as a successful Republican campaign manager and political consultant. He has also served in government and the non-profit sector. He is currently exiled from the Republican Party. He lives in Nashville.
WSMV, May 4, 2026 - MNPS Superintendent Dr. Adrienne Battle spent $19,293 on travel over the past two years, including a $700 dinner for her and staff and hotel rooms at luxury properties, according to receipts on her district credit card.
Battle’s travel spending vastly outpaced her superintendent peers in Tennessee. Memphis Shelby County Schools’ superintendent spent $721 on travel in the same time period. Williamson County’s superintendent spent $8,120.95. Sumner County’s superintendent spent $1,021.38. Rutherford and Wilson County superintendents spent zero on travel.
The examination of Battle’s spending follows a $6.5 million lawsuit settlement and a $165,000 office suite remodel.
by Rod Williams, May 4, 2026 - In Facebook exchanges with idiots or sometimes in face-to-face exchanges with them, I will say something like Trump is a threat to our democracy or we must defend democracy and the person I am talking to will say, "We're not a democracy; we are a republic."
It is exasperating. There is no use even trying to engage such idiots. I try to explain that a republic is a form of democracy, but I think it goes over their head. Sometimes, to preempt the retort, I will say, "Trump is a threat to our republican form of democracy," but that should not be necessary. A republic is a form of democracy. America is a democracy.