Saturday, January 05, 2013

Lesbian scholar in the field of “womanist theology” to head Vandy theology school

Emilie M. Townes
Lesbian homosexual activist Emilie M. Townes, a distinguished Yale University scholar whose areas of expertise include Christian ethics and "womanist theology," has been named dean of Vanderbilt University Divinity School, effective July 1, 2013, pending board approval.

Womanist theology "is a religious conceptual framework which reconsiders and revises the traditions, practices, scriptures, and biblical interpretation with a special lens to empower and liberate African American women in America."  (link) As far as I can determine Womanist theology is blend of   Feminist theology , Black theology, and liberation theology.  

Townes is the author of Womanist Ethics and the Cultural Production of Evil and she pastored United Faith Affinitas, a Black LGBT  (Lesbian, Gay, Bi-sexual, Transgendered) congregation in Chicago. She is also a blogger at The Huffington Post. She recently wed her same sex partner in Connecticut.

This appointment of a lesbian activist as Dean of Theology at Vanderbilt follows an earlier slap in the face to Christians, when in 2012 Vanderbilt announced that Christian student organizations could no longer require their leaders to be Christian. 

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Dean proposes Arena upgrades which will crowd out other improvement projects

On Friday, the Mayor presented his Capital Improvement Budget (CIB) to the Council. The CIB is not really a budget, but is a planning document of proposed capital outlays identifying and prioritizing projects and the means of financing them. The CIB does not appropriate funds, but instead identifies those projects that are eligible for consideration for funding in the Capital Spending Plan.

When the Council passes an operating budget, so many cents out of the tax levy is allocated to fund the Capitol Improvements Budget.  The Council determines that amount. Unless a project is in the CIB, the Council cannot fund it. The more of the tax levy the Council allocates to capital improvements, the deeper down into the priority list the city can reach.  Many projects are in the CIB but never get funded. Citizens who want a new school, park, police precinct, or major roadway improvement in their neighborhood, need to make sure it is in the CIB and that it has a high ranking. As soon as the CIB is posted, I will provide a link.

Today's Tennessean reports that Dean is calling for a major upgrade to the rear of the arena which will face the front on the new mammoth convention center. This sounds like a reasonable thing to do. Having made the major investment of the new convention center, it should not face the ugly back side of the arena. When conventioneers walk out of the convention center they should see something pleasant and a place to spend money. They need to be enticed to leave the center and see the city. However, if this project is a priority, then other projects will not be funded. Seven million dollars could fund a lot of neighborhood needs. (Read, Dean calls for upgrades at arena.)  

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

More on Mark Winslow sues State GOP

Mark Winslow
Mark Winslow, the former Chief of Staff of the Tennessee Republican Party is suing the Tennessee Republican Party. He already had a law suit pending against U.S. Rep. Chuck Fleischmann and Chip Saltsman, a former top aid to Fleishmann. He amended his suit to include the State GOP. He is seeking $500,000 in compensatory damages and $250,000 in punitive damages from Saltsman.

This conflict stems from the 2010 primary campaign between Robin Smith and Chuck Fleishman. Winslow was working for Robin Smith in that campaign. Prior to that campaign, Smith was State Party Chair and Winslow was her Chief of Staff.  According to sources, shortly before Smith left office as Chair of the Party, she gave Winslow a contract, which is unusual.  When Devaney took over as Chair of the Party, naturally he wanted to select his own chief of staff, so to terminated Winslow and awarded him severance pay of $12,504.

During the Fleishman-Smith campaign, someone released Winslow's payroll records to Saltsman and the Fleishman campaign ran an add critical of Smith's management of the Republican Party. She had left the party with a substantial debt. The salary and bonuses paid Winslow, who by then was working on Smith's campaign, was used as an example of her poor management of the party.  I don't know how much Winslow was making and do not know how much is reasonable for that position so I don't know if he was paid lavishly or not. As far as leaving the party in debt, after a campaign it is not unusual for a State or local party to be broke or in debt, so again, I don't know if that was valid criticism or not.

The Fleishman-Smith campaign was hotly contested. There were twenty-one candidates vying for the seat left vacant by Zack Wamp who had chosen not to seek reelection so he could pursue a race for governor. In this crowed field, the two leading candidates were Fleishman and Smith.  Fleischmann put $544,000 of his own money into the campaign.  Former Arkansas Governor and Fox TV host Mike Huckabee endorsed Fleichman; the Club for Growth endorsed Smith. While the Fleishman campaign accused Smith of mismanagement of the Party, the Smith campaign ran ads calling Fleischmann a “slip-and-fall” attorney who had gotten rich by suing a local rifle club, Walmart and a church. Fleishman won the race by getting 30% of the vote to Smith's 28% , beating Smith by 1,300 votes out of 80,000 votes cast. After the primary, Smith refused to endorse Fleishman.

Winslow is suing, claiming he has been unable to get work as a political consultant due the damage the Fleishman campaign did to his reputation and charging that payroll records should not have been made public. Winslow is currently serving on the State Executive Committee of the State Party. In essence, he is suing himself. The party is already spending money on attorney's to represent itself in this matter. When the State Executive Committee meets in February, I would bet Winslow will get an icy reception.

Just to spread more light on who's who in this mess, Chip  Saltsman is also a  former chairman of the Tennessee Republican Party and in 2008 was national manager of Mike Huckabee's presidential campaign.

For other reports on this issue see here and here. If anyone has insight as to what is going on or an opinion, please leave a comment. If you have a copy of the law suit, I would like to see it. If you would be so kind as to email it to me, I would appreciate it.

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Thursday, January 03, 2013

First Tuesday is Monday July 7th, Jim Tracy and Bill Ketron.

Sen. Jim Tracy
First Tuesday this month will be on Monday January 7th at  The Law Offices of Waller/Lansden., 511 Union Street. 

Guest will be State Senator Jim Tracy, who has just announce he will be running for the US Congress challenging  Representative Scott DesJarlais for the Republican nomination in the 4th District. Also, State Senator Bill Ketron, the Republican Caucus Chairman will be speaking. There will be a discussion about what to expect in the 2013 Legislative Session.


Sen. Bill Ketron
1st Tuesday is always a great event. Hear interesting speakers in a room with a view, have a nice meal for a reasonable price and network with other Republicans. Park for free or cheap in the public garage beneath the library, which is less than a block away. Anyone is welcome to attend. The meeting is exactly one hour long, so you can attend and not be gone from work that long. If you are a Republican or a conservative and in the Nashville area, you really owe it to yourself to start attending 1st Tuesday. Previous guest speakers have included, Governor Bill Haslam, Lieutenant Governor Ron Ramsey, Senator Lamar Alexander, Mayor Karl Dean, former Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez, economist Authur Laffer, Senator Bob Corker and former Speaker of the House and presidential candidate Newt Gringich.

To reserve lunch or to be added to the list and be notified of future meetings, visit the website at First Tuesday.

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Wednesday, January 02, 2013

Metro Limo price-fixing to go to jury trial!

Fantastic news! Metro's price fixing ordinance is going to go to a jury trial in just twenty days!
Channel 4 does a great job explaining the issues.

To learn more about this story click here, here, here and here.

To see everything I have posted on this story and related issues about  Metro's Transportation Commission's abuse of power, harassment and Metro's other attempts to restrict transportation competition and fix prices, follow this link.  

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Al Gore sells Current TV to Al-Jazeera

Al Gores cable channel, Current TV, makes MSNBC look almost moderate. Al G has now sold it to Al J.
 LOS ANGELES (AP) — Al-Jazeera, the Pan-Arab news channel that struggled to win space on American cable television, has acquired Current TV, boosting its reach nearly ninefold to about 40 million homes. With a focus on U.S. news, it plans to rebrand the left-leaning news network that cofounder Al Gore couldn't make relevant.

The former vice president confirmed the sale Wednesday, saying in a statement that Al-Jazeera shares Current TV's mission "to give voice to those who are not typically heard; to speak truth to power; to provide independent and diverse points of view; and to tell the stories that no one else is telling." (link)

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Marsha Blackburn: Why I voted 'no'.

Friends-

From my first day in office, I’ve promised you that you might not agree with every vote I take, but you’ll know why I did it. Last night, I voted “No” on HR 8. The so-called deal to avert the fiscal cliff did nothing but impose devastating tax increases without including any meaningful spending reductions. To vote for this bill would have been a vote to make a bad situation much worse.

The problem in Washington is not that we tax too little, it’s that we spend too much. This bill increases our debt by nearly $4 trillion over the next decade. I recently supported the Spending Reduction Act that passed the House before the Holidays. Unfortunately, like most House-passed legislation this year, the Spending Reduction Act never saw the light of the Senate.

For the future of our children and grandchildren, we have to exercise fiscal restraint. I know it's what my constituents expect from me. It's time to draw a line in the sand. We can't afford to keep spending money we don't have on programs the American people don't want. We also must make serious reforms to entitlements, stabilize the trust funds, and work to restrict regulatory authority. I could not vote for legislation that refused to focus on these critical issues.

My best,

Marsha

Here are two videos from interviews I did this morning where I discussed my vote against the bill: America's Newsroom and CNN Starting Point. Please watch and pass along to your friends, family, and neighbors.

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

State Sen. Tracy Announces Challenge To DesJarlais

State Sen. Tracy Announces Challenge To DesJarlais
State Sen. Jim Tracy has officially announced that he will run for the congressional seat held by embattled fellow Republican U.S. Rep. Scott DesJarlais.
more>>

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Cato: Grading the Fiscal Cliff Deal: Terrible, but Could Be Worse


January 2, 2013, by Daniel J. Mitchell - The faux drama in Washington is finally over. The misfits in Washington reached a deal on the fiscal cliff. Republicans and Democrats managed to come together and decide that they should get a bigger slice of what the American people earn.
 
Gee, what a surprise. First, the good news: … …

Oh, wait, there isn’t any.

 Now for the bad news.(link)

My Comment:  While the fiscal cliff deal really stinks, and there is a lot not to like about it such as the $1 spending cut for $10 in revenue, and the pork-laden goodies in the bill, and the increase in taxes, this is only a temporary fix to avoid what would have been worse. I am not going to judge too harshly those who supported the deal. Sure, the can was kicked down the road, but only for two months. At the end of February, the Congress must vote on raising the debt limit. Congress can again argue spending and revenue all over again. 

There does come a time when the adults must threaten to tear up the credit card unless real budget discipline is shown and if discipline is not shown, then the adults must follow through and tear up the credit card. If we keep putting off the necessary spending cuts, then we will have a major crisis. It is inevitable that our borrowing and inflating of the money supply will have consequences. We cannot continue our prolific spending like this for ever. Unless we can get the Democrats to address the problem of government spending and show willingness to address entitlements, then we might as well have the crisis now rather than later. For the next round, I hope Republicans hold firm and risk default if there is not serious effort to address entitlement reform and reduce spending.

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Is America's Founding secure? Join the Discussion.

Is America's founding secure. And, what does America's Founding mean to you? What was its vision? Did it have one? What are the threats to it today? Will it last? Does it need some "fixing"?

Join the Discussion. This months meeting of Conservative Fusion will not feature a book, but an open discussion on the topic , "Is America's Founding Secure?"

The meeting is Tuesday, January 15, 2013, 7PM. To join, follow this link: Conservative Fusion.

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

The 'deal' has 10 to 1 ratio of tax increases to spending cuts


January 2, 2013- Representative Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) called it “a happy start to a new year.” That probably tells you all you need to know about the fiscal cliff deal that passed the House last night.
The bill—which President Obama has promised to sign, though he took off for Hawaii again after the vote—has a 10 to 1 ratio of tax increases to spending cuts. This is the President’s version of a “balanced” approach.

In addition to tax increases on Americans making more than $250,000 a year, the bipartisan deal will actually raise taxes on the vast majority of American workers. How? The payroll tax “holiday” has ended. The Wall Street Journal calculates that the “typical U.S. family earning $50,000 a year” will lose “an annual income boost of $1,000.”

Meanwhile, the higher tax rates will hit small businesses and investors—which is grim news for a country in need of new jobs. (link)

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

A Special Goodbye To Outgoing EPA Head Lisa Jackson...

who our Metro Council really likes.


Our Metro Council has voted unanimously endorsing the EPA. Yes, even the conservative members of the Council. They really like all of the things Lisa Jackson did to regulated the economy. Our Council has urged the EPA to vigorously enforce the clean air standards including regulation of Co2 which Congress never authorized.

To learn more about the Council's support of the radical EPA agenda, go here, here and here

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

The Fiscal Cliff 'deal' was a pork-laden rip off says ALG







Jan. 2, 2013, Fairfax, VA—Americans for Limited Government, a non-partisan group dedicated to limiting the size and scope of government at all levels, blasted members of Congress who voted in favor of the tax increase measure that passed both the Senate and House of Representatives on New Year's Day.

Bill Wilson, president of the group denounced the law saying, "This so-called 'deal' is typical Washington, D.C., laden with pork including a subsidy for Obama's Hollywood buddies and even NASCAR, while increasing taxes on every working American. Incredibly the law will be classified as a tax cut because it passed after the Bush tax cuts expired, so in D.C. doublespeak, politicians will claim to have cut taxes when everyone's taxes are actually going up."

Aninitial analysis of the legislation utilizing estimates from the Joint Committee on Taxation conducted by ALG showed that while the tax increases on those making more than $400,000 a year will generate approximately $30 billion in revenues a year, the cost of servicing the projected increased federal debt of $1.2 trillion will actually eat away about 88 cents of every new dollar raised.

"By avoiding actually dealing with Washington's spending addiction, they have raised taxes to do little more than pay the increased interest on the debt over the next year. Meanwhile, the head-in-the-sand types on Capitol Hill will be clamoring to spend this 'new money' on their favored special interests. We are truly through the looking glass."


Attachments:

"Landing on the fiscal rocks below," by ALG senior editor Robert Romano, Jan. 2, 2013 at http://netrightdaily.com/2013/01/landing-on-the-fiscal-rocks-below/



Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

Monday, December 31, 2012

Senator Bob Corker: Any Fiscal Cliff Deal Today Will Be 'Irrelevant



Senator Bob Corker (R-TN) said Monday anything that happens in the final stages of fiscal cliff negotiations is "really inconsequential." It wasn't pessimism, though: "It really doesn't matter. It's going to happen. We will have a solution."

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories

What we think we know about violence in America

While the horror of  the elementary school shooting in Newtown Connecticut should not be minimized, we should nevertheless, not let it lead us to believing untrue things.     

We, nor our children, are at a great risk of being killed in a mass shooting. The chances of being killed in a mass shooting are about what they are for being struck by lightning. You have a much greater risk of being killed in an auto accident or being killed playing football or bicycling or dying from any number of illnesses than you do of being killed in a mass shooting. 

The number of people killed in mass shooting is not increasing. The chart to the right reflects the research of criminologist Alan Fox showing the number of victims, offenders and deaths from mass shooting from 1980- 1910. It shows no trend upward.
This year has been a terrible year for such mass shootings, with the shooting at a movie theater in Auroa Colorado in July, the Sikh temple in Wisconsin in August, a shooting in  Minneapolis in September and then the Connecticut elementary school on December 14. However, one year does not make a trend. 

While criminologist Alan Fox looked at all mass killing including those involving robbery, Mother Jones took another approach and looked only at killing sprees with no rational motive and found an increase in 2012, reflected in the chart to the right.

One could look at this chart and just as validly and observe a 90% drop in mass killings from 1999 to 2000 and no mass killings at all in 2002. Does that really tell us anything of significance? All we know is that we had an unusually high number of mass killings in 2012.


Another thing that this horrific killing in Connecticut has led many to believe is that crime is increasing.  Crime is actually on the decline and has been since about 1980 and has been dropping rapidly since about 1994. This data is available for anyone who wants to know it.

But the rate of firearm homicides is up, is it not?  No, it is not. Firearm homicide is at its lowest point since at least 1981: 3.6 per 100,000 people in 2010. The high point was 7 in 1993.

There are other things people think they know and those things are true. The United States has a higher rate of violence than other modern industrialized countries.  We do not have the highest rate in the world however. Much of the less developed world has a much, much higher crime rate but that is no consolation. We do not want to be compared to South Africa or Columbia but to Europe or Canada and comparing the United States with similar nations finds that U.S. homicide rate almost seven times higher than rates in the other high-income countries.

This, however, needs to be put in some context. We are a very large and diverse country and comparing the US to a homogeneous nation like most of the industrialized nations of Europe is not an equal comparison. Much of our higher crime rate can be attributed to Black-on-Black crime and is really a problem of the Black underclass. If one were to exclude Baltimore, Detroit, Washington D.C and New Orleans from the equation, America would not be that much more violent than the UK. That of course does not explain all of it by any means but is a factor.

I do accept that the ready availability of guns in America and our history and gun culture contributes to a higher violent crime rate and may contribute to the incidents of mass killings. There are other factors which may contribute also such as the state of mental health services, a culture that glorifies violence in movies and video games, a declining religiosity and sense of community, a weakened family structure, and "taking God out of the class room." All of these factors should be examined, but they need to be examined calmly and we should not "do something" just for the sake of doing something. We should not jump to conclusions and make decisions based on emotions and things we think we know, that are not true.

For sources and more discussion see here, here, here, and here.

Stumble Upon Toolbar
My Zimbio
Top Stories