Phil Roe |
Top Stories
A right-leaning disgruntled Republican comments on the news of the day and any other thing he damn-well pleases.
Phil Roe |
Reposted from Daily Signal:
We are petitioning that Carol Swain be temporarily suspended from her position as professor of political science and law at Vanderbilt University pending an investigation into student allegations of unprofessional intimidation on social media, discriminatory practices in the classroom, and unclear representation as a Public Figure with invocations of the Vanderbilt name on her Facebook page.Swain said the students behind the protests never took any of her classes, all of which are elective.
…
Over the past few years, Professor Carol Swain has become synonymous with bigotry, intolerance, and unprofessionalism. While Swain first and foremost has a right to her personal beliefs and the right to freedom of speech within and outside of the classroom, it recently came to the attention of the Vanderbilt community that Carol Swain has let her hate-filled prejudices negatively impact her work, our student body, and Vanderbilt’s reputation.
Professor Swain’s opinions are her own. They do not reflect the opinions of the university in any way. They are not my opinions, the opinions of the provost, or the opinions of university leadership.Zeppos did not address whether or not the university planned to investigate allegations of discrimination made against Swain. According to the petition, those allegations include:
…
Vanderbilt University is committed to diversity, inclusion, and freedom from discrimination. Ensuring that our campus is a safe, welcoming, and supportive environment for every member of the Vanderbilt community has been, and will always be, our top priority.
Marsha Blackburn |
Press release, NASHVILLE, Tenn.--Tennessee Republican Party Chairman Ryan Haynes released the following statement regarding Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton's campaign stops in Tennessee:
Today in Tennessee, Hillary Clinton decided to address a symptom rather than the root cause of the problem. Clinton-inspired ObamaCare was written, passed, and implemented by Democrats. Now, Americans are seeing increased prices, fewer choices, and limited access to quality health care. Yet Hillary Clinton refuses to admit it's not working. Instead, she's once again doubling down on a failed policy. We need to put patients and families back in charge of their healthcare decisions. You won't get that with any of Clinton's big government proposals.
Background
Web link: http://tngop.org/tngop-statement-on-hillary-clintons-tennessee-campaign-stops/
A Volunteer State Two Step
Clinton’s Tax Credit Proposals Will Do Little To Stop The Lower Wages And Higher Health Care Costs They’ve Seen As A Result Of The Obama Economy
Today, Clinton Will Discuss Her Proposed Tax Credits That Attempt To Solve Rising Health Care Costs And The Burden Of College Tuition. “Hillary Rodham Clinton is proposing a tax credit to help people deal with the rising costs of health care, the first in a series of tax benefits the Democratic presidential front-runner will be rolling out in the coming weeks. The health care credit will cover what Clinton's campaign described as ‘excessive’ out-of-pocket expenditures. Eligible families will get up to $5,000 in credits and individuals as much as $2,500.” (Adrian Sainz and Lisa Lerer, “Clinton Proposing Tax Credits To Help With Health Care Costs,” Associated Press, 11/20/15)
As A Part Of Clinton’s Healthcare Plan, She Has Proposed A Refundable Tax Credit Of Up To $2,500 For Individuals And $5,000 Per Family For Americans With Out-Of-Pocket Healthcare Expenses In Excess Of 5 Percent Of Their Income. “The plan also would provide a refundable tax credit of up to $2,500 for individuals and $5,000 per family for Americans with out-of-pocket healthcare expenses in excess of 5 percent of their income.” (Amanda Becker, “Clinton Plan To Cut Health Costs Includes Tax Credits, More Sick Visits,” Reuters, 9/23/15)
As A Part Of Clinton’s Massive Education Spending Proposals, Clinton Features An Extension Of The American Opportunity Tax Credit. “Extend the American Opportunity Tax Credit ensuring that middle-class families avoid a tax increase of up to $2,500 per year. Hillary Clinton's plan will permanently extend the American Opportunity Tax Credit, which now provides up to $2,500 in tax relief for tuition and other expenses to everyday American families – including $1,000 that is refundable and fully available for lower-income families.” (Press Release, “Hillary Clinton’s New College Compact Benefits Historically Black Colleges And Universities (HBCUs),” The Briefing, Accessed 8/12/15)
“It Isn’t Clear Yet” How Clinton Will Pay For Her Tax Credits As Her Campaign Is Yet To Provide Any Specifics.,
Clinton Claims She Will Pay For Her Healthcare Tax Credit By “Demanding Rebates From Drug Manufacturers And Asking The Most Fortunate To Pay Their Fair Share” But Has Provided No Specifics. “The plan requires the three pre-deductible sick visits to be provided by insurers and employers, although ‘a person with private coverage could save over $100 per year.’ And the tax credit—up to $5,000 per family and $2,500 per individual—will be fully paid for by ‘demanding rebates from drug manufacturers and asking the most fortunate to pay their fair share.” (Caitlin Owens, “Hillary Clinton Releases More Plans To Cut Health Care Costs,” National Journal, 9/23/15)
“It Isn’t Clear Yet” Who Would Face New Taxes, What Deductions And Loopholes She Would Close, Or How Much Money Would Be Raised For Her Extension Of The American Opportunity Tax Credit.
“The Democratic presidential candidate's campaign estimates that her plan -- which would include ‘no-loan tuition’ at state schools -- would cost about $350 billion over 10 years. Like many candidates, lawmakers and presidents before her, she is looking to the richest Americans to foot the bill. ‘Clinton's New College Compact plan ... will be fully paid for by closing tax loopholes and expenditures for the most fortunate,’ according to documents from the campaign. Just how fortunate isn't clear yet, nor is it clear which specific tax breaks and ‘loopholes’ Clinton will target specifically.” (Jeanne Sahadi, “Who Will Pay For Hillary Clinton’s College Plan,” CNN, 8/10/15)
Despite Clinton’s Claims, The “Real Winners” Of The American Opportunity Tax Credit Are “Higher Up The Ladder.”
Despite Clinton’s Claim To Help Middle- And Low-Income Americans, The “Real Winners” Of The American Opportunity Tax Credit (AOTC) Are “Higher Up The Ladder.” “In a recent paper, for instance, economists George Bulman and Carolyn Hoxby found that the AOTC caused a ‘massive increase’ in the share of tax expenditures that went to students from families earning more than $120,000. … The refundable portion does help some low-income families that would not have benefited under earlier tax credits, but the real winners are higher up the ladder.” (Andrew Kelly, “Hillary Clinton’s Higher Education Plan: Something (Expensive) For Everyone,” Forbes, 8/28/15)
The AOTC Continues To “Disproportionately Benefit Upper-Income Families” Rather Than Lower-Income Americans Whom Clinton Claims To Help. “Here again, though, the problem is that tax credits disproportionately benefit upper-income families. These families are the most likely to spend enough on college expenses and pay enough in taxes to qualify for the full credits. An analysis by the Tax Policy Center found that a quarter of the money spent on the AOTC and half of the spending on the student loan interest deduction went to families earning between $100,000 and $200,000 a year. ” (Andrew Kelly, “Hillary Clinton’s Higher Education Plan: Something (Expensive) For Everyone,” Forbes, 8/28/15)
The American Opportunity Tax Credit Fuels Higher Tuition Costs, Increasing The Burden Of Higher Education On Low-Income Americans. “It is important, however, that while direct grants to low-income students only increase demand for low-income students, who are less likely to go to college than more affluent students in the first place, tuition tax credits increase demand for all students, including those who are already willing and able to spend large sums on higher education. Colleges can respond to increased demand by increasing supply (e.g., admitting more students), by becoming more selective, or by charging higher prices to capture more of the aid.” (Reihan Salam, “How Tuition Tax Credits Fuel The Higher-Ed Industrial Complex,” National Review, 1/20/15)
“It’s Not At All Clear” That Clinton’s Healthcare Tax Credit “Would Provide An Actual Cure” As ObamaCare Already Caps Out-Of-Pocket Costs
“It’s Not At All Clear That Clinton’s Proposals – Some Of Which Have Been Mentioned For Decades” Would Lower Out-Of-Pocket Costs. “But while surveys show that health costs, and particularly drug costs, are a top concern for many voters, it's not at all clear that Clinton's proposals – some of which have been mentioned for decades – would provide an actual cure.” (Julie Rovner, “Does Hillary Clinton Have The Prescription For Out-Of-Pocket Costs,” Kaiser Health News, 9/25/15)
IT’S OBAMA-CLINTON ECONOMIC POLICIES THAT HAVE SQUEEZED TENNESSEANS WITH LOWER WAGES AND HIGHER HEALTH CARE COSTS
Clinton Gives Obama An “A” Grade On The Economy.
In An Interview With The Boston Globe, Clinton Gave The Obama Administration An “A” On The Economy. HILLARY CLINTON: “I’d give him an ‘A.’ I don’t think he gets the credit he deserves for saving our economy from falling into a great depression, for saving the auto industry which represents millions of jobs up and down the supply chain, for beginning the crackdown on Wall Street abuses with Dodd-Frank, for getting the Affordable Care Act passed, for really being as responsive as he could possibly be given the obstructionism that he faced with the republicans in congress.” (Hillary Clinton Interview With The Boston Globe, 10/17/15)
Tennesseans Continue To Feel The Burden Of ObamaCare As Insurance Premiums Have Skyrocketed.
The Tennessean Headline: “Tennessee's ACA Rate Hikes Are Among Highest In U.S.” (Holly Fletcher, “Tennessee’s ACA Rate Hikes Are Among Highest In U.S.,” The Tennessean, 10/27/15)
Health Insurance Premiums On The ObamaCare Exchange In Tennessee “Are Among The Highest In The Country.” “The health insurance premium increases for 2016 on the federally run exchange for Tennesseans are among the highest in the country.” (Holly Fletcher, “Tennessee’s ACA Rate Hikes Are Among Highest In U.S.,” The Tennessean, 10/27/15)
Tennessee Has The Sixth Highest Premiums In The Country. “There are five states with increases higher than Tennessee for upcoming enrollment. Oklahoma leads the country with a 35.7 percent increase. Montana will have a 34.5 percent increase, Alaska a 31.5 percent increase, New Mexico a 25.8 percent increase and a 24.7 percent increase in South Dakota.” (Holly Fletcher, “Tennessee’s ACA Rate Hikes Are Among Highest In U.S.,” The Tennessean, 10/27/15)
In Tennessee, “The Second-Lowest Cost Silver Plan Is Set To Go Up 23.4 Percent, While The National Average Is 7.5 Percent, According To The U.S. Department Of Health And Human Services.” “The second-lowest cost silver plan is set to go up 23.4 percent, while the national average is 7.5 percent, according to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.” (Holly Fletcher, “Tennessee’s ACA Rate Hikes Are Among Highest In U.S.,” The Tennessean, 10/27/15)
BlueCross BlueShield Of Tennessee, Tennessee’s Largest Insurance Provider, Will Have Increased Rates Averaging 36.3% In 2016. “The state regulator approved Friday several large rate requests from health insurers' 2016 plans on the federal exchange. BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee, the state's largest insurance provider, had its 36.3 percent average increase approved.” (Holly Fletcher, “ACA Rate Hikes May Not Cover Losses,” The Tennessean, 8/21/15)
Premiums Will Increase $62.50 For The Benchmark Plan In 2015. “In Tennessee the benchmark plan on the exchange established by the Affordable Care Act cost $203 in 2015, according to Kaiser Health Foundation. That plan would be $250.50 in 2016, for the 23.4 percent increase. The state's benchmark plan in 2014 was $188.” (Holly Fletcher, “Tennessee’s ACA Rate Hikes Are Among Highest In U.S.,” The Tennessean, 10/27/15)
I look forward to this hearing and I am confident there will be many bills brought this year to address this issue. It has long been clear that we need to secure our borders and do a better job vetting who we allow to enter this country. The atrocity in Paris merely brought added clarity to the issue. The Western world is at war with radical Islam. Period. The United States has throughout history been the most welcoming country to immigrants in the world. But we are a nation and a nation has borders. The state of Tennessee has an absolute right to do what is necessary within the law to protect our borders and our citizens. We need not apologize for it
To follow along with the Council agenda, the Council staff analysis and my commentary follow this link. At 58 minutes long this is a short meeting. Councilman Greene who was a victim of a recent shooting is back. All mayoral appointees to boards and commission are confirmed. All resolutions on the consent agenda pass and none are pulled off consent from the floor.
Of the resolutions, one that is not on the consent agenda is RESOLUTION NO. RS2015-51 which appropriates $5,476,000.00 from the General Fund Reserve Fund for the
purchase of equipment and building repairs for various departments. Councilman Elrod ask for an explanation of the fund that this money comes from and how often request like this are made. His question is answered. For this discussion see time stamp 14:36 -18:20.
The "4 percent fund" or "the general fund reserve" is 4 percent of the Metro budget which is put aside and request for money from this fund can be made when needed. One can understand that equipment breaks during the year and things have to be addressed during the year, but in my view there is not consistency in what can be funded out of the 4% fund. As an example, tonight's request includes $1.5 million to purchase library books. Certainly library books should not be funded by bond issues, but why are library books not part of the regular Public Library budget? I see no more logic to purchasing library books out of the 4% fund than I do purchasing asphalt for public works out of this fund. It seems the library should anticipate purchasing library books and include that in their regular budget request. In the end however, I am not sure it matters; it like an individual paying for something out of his right pocket rather than there left. It does however distort the true cost of a government function.
Also tonight, not on consent is RESOLUTION NO. RS2015-63 which is a memorializing resolution which would put the Council on record requested President Obama and the Congress to oppose the
TransPacific Partnership (TPP). The rules Committee had approved the resolution 5 for 1 against and 1 not voting. An opposing vote in the rules committee is what kept the resolution from being on the consent agenda. I would bet the members of the council are no more informed about this complex issue than the average man on the street. Why they think they are qualified to have a valid opinion is beyond me. I wonder how many of them even know the nine countries involved in the agreement? Has any of them read the seven thousand pages that make up the TPP? From what I know about it, I oppose it, primarily because I don't trust the Obama Administration to negotiate a deal in America's interest and some organization that I trust say it surrenders some American sovereignty. However, I do not think our local council should be expressing an opinion about something that is beyond their pay grade. If they want to spend months becoming an expert on TPP, they should be serving in the U. S. Congress, not the Metro Council.
Council member Freddie O'Connell makes the point that other bodies such as our congressman and local members of the State legislature or the Mayor's office have not reached an opinion on the merits of the TPP and he does not feel competent to take a position. Good for him! Councilman Elrod makes the same point as does Sheri Weiner and Steve Glover. The vote is 17 for, 4 against, and 17 abstentions and 2 not voting. This is good! Rules of the Council require that when the council passes a memorizing resolution directed to another body that the vote of the Council be included. In the past the Council passed some equally ridiculous memorializing resolutions about complex issue they knew nothing about, such as expressing an opinion on the parts-per-million of CO2 that should be in the air. That less than half the council voted for this in encouraging. When member of Congress see that only 17 of our 40 member Council voted for this, that will make it have less impact assuming it would have any impact anyway. I hope this is establishing a new attitude on the part of the Council. To see the video discussion see time stamp 20:12-30:19.
All bills on First Reading pass without objection. A couple bill on Second Reading are deferred and the rest pass and there is no controversy. Most of the bills are boring zoning bills.
The only bills of interest on Third reading are BILL NO. BL2015-13 and BILL NO. BL2015-14 which are designed to stop the development of a rock quarry in the vicinity of Old Hickory Dam.The owner may already be "vested" in the rock quarry, however, and these bills may not accomplish their objectives.
The Vice Mayor announces that on Thursday of this week the Rules Committee will meet to establish new rules for the new Council. I hope the council takes this process seriously. There are some rules that I think need changing. Rule 30 restricts a council member from speaking more than four minutes on an issue. Sometimes, there needs to be debate and sometimes a case can not be made in under four minutes. Also, on zoning matters the three minute time limit to hear from the public is overly restrictive. Not often, but on occasion, a member of the public cannot make their case in less than three minutes.
In my view, memorizing resolutions addressed to the U. S. Congress or the President should not be permitted to be on the consent agenda. If tonight's resolution addressing TPP had not received one "no" vote in the Rules committee then instead of getting 17 positive votes, it would have likely sailed on through on the consent agenda and got a unanimous vote. In the past the council has voted for everything from the parts-per-million of CO2 to be permitted in the air to endorsing Obamacare to approving the EPA regulations that will force the closing of coal-fired power plants and lead to an increase in electric cost. I don't think the Council should be acting on any resolutions of this nature, but at least these complex controversial issues should not slip through the Council on a consent agenda.
Below is the The Tennessean's report on the Council meeting: Council's action unlikely to stop Old Hickory rock quarry
Joseph Woodson |
Well, Gol-ly, I could have told you that and you wouldn't have had to spend all that money on consultants. |
Los Angeles Times - Contrary to predictions used to promote the first phase of the Expo
light rail line between downtown and Los Angeles' Westside, a new study
has found that the $930-million project has done little to relieve
traffic congestion in the area. (link)
My comment: Metro council members and those studying mass transit for Nashville would be wise to read this cautionary tale and take it to heart. Spending $930 million for 8.6 miles of rail is not a solution. Thankfully we dodged the Amp bullet. For alternative solutions to traffic congestion and transportation needs see this link and this link.
TN GOP press release, NASHVILLE, Tenn.--Tennessee Republican Party Chairman Ryan Haynes released the following statement after learning of the Tennessee Democratic Party's latest press release:
Tennessee Democrats show a stunning level of ignorance about the role of the states and the complex world we live in with the statement released today. Leaders can legitimately take pause about our immigration procedures in light of the fact we are still answering basic questions from the worst terrorist attack in France since World War II.
Moreover, questioning the Obama Administration's ability to handle the process of verifying the background of individuals trying to enter this country when it could not effectively roll out a healthcare website or when it labeled terrorists 'contained' just before they killed 129 innocents far from a battlefield is entirely appropriate. As the President stated, Democrats view the Paris attack as a 'setback.' We believe that is a gross understatement.
11/13 was a horrific tragedy that requires sober judgment, an examination of our military policies, and a clear-eyed strategy for dealing with the refugee crisis while ensuring our homeland is safe.
Governor Haslam’s letter calling for the federal government to halt placement of refugees in Tennessee is a mistake because it ignores our founding principles. It ignores that we offer hope to those fleeing from violence and tyranny. It ignores that we offer opportunity to those who will grasp it. It ignores that our strength lies in our welcoming those who seek a better life and that our power comes from generations of immigrants that came here to make a better life for their children. But it’s also a mistake because rather than reaching out to the federal government to have a substantive conversation about keeping our state safe, he and the Republicans in the State House and State Senate are offering us the same old politically-motivated, reactionary response that shows a startling lack of independent thought. It also shows that, once again, Republicans in Tennessee are more interested in playing politics than solving problems.
As we mourn the loss of innocent life from Friday’s horrific and cowardly attacks in Paris, these terrible events have once again shown us that the threat of Islamic terrorism knows no boundaries and recognizes no borders. We as a state must do everything we can to provide Tennesseans the safe environment to live, work and raise a family that so many across the world seek.
Since Friday the Tennessee Department of Safety and Homeland Security has been in contact with the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, and this administration has actively shared information with our local public safety partners across Tennessee.
We are currently working to get specifics from the U.S. Department of State on the status of any Syrian refugees currently slated to come to Tennessee. While screening, acceptance and placement is legally under the authority of the federal government, they have said in the past they would be open to cooperating with receiving states. Today I’m asking the federal government to suspend placements in Tennessee until states can become more of a partner in the vetting process.
For those who want a better understanding of the financial issues facing the city, you learn more from watching the B & F committee than the Metro Council meeting. The B & F committee is where council members have an opportunity to ask questions of the Finance Director and department heads. If you don't want to watch the meeting in real time, you can watch the meeting in double time and slow it down when it gets to something interesting. If your version of the video does not allow you that option, follow this link and make the adjustment.
Gallatin News Examiner reporter Jennifer Easton gets reaction from Ken Jakes after his victory in court. |
Judge
Dee Gay, a criminal court judge, took the case after the Sumner County Chancellor was recused because he had family members employed by the school district. |
Carol Swain |