Southern Poverty Law Center listed as a hate group.

Today the Southern Poverty Law Center was listed as a hate group by the prestigious Institute for the Study of Republican Disgruntlement. The listing was based on SPLC's cavalier labeling of various conservative, religious and pro-life groups as "hate groups."  The most recent hateful activity of the SPLC was in the slanderous labeling of Alliance Defending Freedom as a hate group. 

Alliance Defending Freedom is a public interest law firm and advocacy organization defending religious liberty and traditional values and institutions. The respected legal-advocacy organization has won nine cases at the U.S. Supreme Court in the past seven years. They were litigants in defense of the baker in the MasterpieceCakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission case in which a baker was charged with discrimination because he refused to design a cake for a gay wedding.


The SPLC labels any group that disagrees with their liberal agenda as a "hate group."  The SPLC attempts to silence anyone who disagrees with them on a variety of subjects, such as same-sex marriage,  promotion of homosexuality, abortion, or respect for the constitution. The mainstream press, which has become almost indistinguishable from a PR firm for the Democratic Party, assist SPLC in their slander by acting as if a group is really a "hate group" if they are so labeled by SPLC. The mainstream press gives SPLC respect and prestige. The SPLC list violent and racist groups as hate groups and sprinkles in the listing groups that advocate for traditional values or conservative principles thus equating the groups.

In addition to the Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), other groups unfairly smeared as "hate groups" by the SPLC include  Liberty Counsel, the Family Research Council (FRC), D. James Kennedy Ministries,  American Family Association, Eagle Forum, The Ruth Institute, The John Birch Society, and The American College of Pediatricians.

"Due to the smear tactic of SPLC of lumping together mainstream Christian advocacy groups with groups such as the Nazi Party and the KKK, I think it appropriate to list SPLC as a hate group," said Rod Williams, Executive Director of the Institute for the Study of Republican Disgruntlement. "Hate can  flow many directions and have many targets. It is pretty obvious that the Southern Poverty Law Center hates conservatives and Christians. In fact," continued Williams, "SPLC may be the most dangerous hate group in America. No one takes seriously a ragtag group of angry skin heads or ignorant racist, but because SPLC is taken serious and treated with legitimacy, that makes them dangerous."

Top Stories

Dear Senator Pat Toomey, I am going to keep your 51¢ and not send any money.

While writing this blog post to express my frustration with political fund raising, I got two phone

calls asking me for money. The first was someone telling me he was on a recorded line and he was calling on behalf of President Donald Trump. I cut him off and told him I was just now looking at a pile of mail solicitations and was in no mood to even listen to his pitch.

The other call was from Senator Ted Cruz.  I know it was from Senator Cruz because the little window on my phone told me that was who the call was from. I just picked up the receiver and set it back down. If it really was Senator Cruz, I'm sorry I missed his call. He probably wanted my opinion on some really important issue.

I am so sick of being solicited for political contributions. Look at the pile of solicitations in today's mail.  I say "today's" mail but this is probably about a weeks worth, because I only retrieve my mail from the mail box about once a week. I never get anything important in the mail. All of my important stuff is sent by email or FedEX. So while what you are looking at in the picture is mail from more than one day, that is not all of the solicitation; some are not pictured.

I do open the letters. I open them because a lot of them contain self-addressed stamped envelopes with real stamps.  I am kind of cheap. A stamp cost 47¢, or at lease I think that is the current cost of a first class stamp.  I take out the envelope and save it to reuse. I but a blank label over the address and use it for the rare occasions I do need to send something U.S. mail. I like the letters where the stamp is not affixed to an envelop but is papercliped to the letter inside and visible through the envelop window.  I always save those stamps. The solicitation from Senator Toomey I opened because I am not just going to throw 51¢ in the trash. I did not read the letter however.

In additions to enticing me to open the letter by putting coin in the window, they try to entice me to open the letter by making me feel really important. One of the letters says, "DO NOT DESTROY OFFICIAL DOCUMENT," and "FINAL NOTICE."  And, it is to be delivered "exclusively" to Rod Williams. It is a 2018 Congressional District Census with a document tracking code. It is from the Republican National Committee and they want my opinion on several issue AND they want me to send them some money.

Judicial Watch sent me the "2015 Illegal Alien Election Impact Survey of Judicial Watch Members;" and, a solicitation for money.

A letter from Steve Forbes was an "EXPEDITED DELIVERY GRAM," complete with a little "SPECIAL NOTES ON ENCLOSURE," section telling me how much the letter weighed and the declared value and telling me it was time sensitive.  I didn't read it but opened it, but unfortunately there was no envelope in it with a real stamp. Cheapskate!

Some of the charitable solicitations are as about as bad as the political ones.  Doctors Without Borders sent me a nice tote bag.  If Doctors Without Borders can send me a tote bag unsolicited, I will use it anyway but I am not going to sent them any money until I get in the mood.

I know direct mail solicitation work are they wouldn't keep doing it.  However, if whatever cause Senator Toomey was raising money for can sent me 51¢, they don't need my money. 

I do support causes and candidates from time to time, but once you give to one cause, they must sell your name to a dozen other groups. I don't know if liberal causes and Democrats are as bad as conservative causes and Republicans, but I bet they are. I am thinking about sending a Democrat $5.  I am sure in the next year they would spend a couple hundred dollars soliciting me for money. The solicitation they send me that contain envelopes with stamps, I could get the stamps. For those solicitations they send me with self addressed envelopes with a permit instead of a stamp, I could return and they would have to pay the return postage. If Dems are as bad as Repubs, a $5 contribution could cost them hundreds if I worked it right.

Top Stories

Nashville does not have enough money to pay its bills.

2016 Financial State of Nashville (Released 1/24/2018)

Nashville's Taxpayer Burden™ is -$15,600, and it received a "D" from TIA.

Nashville is a Sinkhole City without enough assets to cover its debt.

Decisions by elected officials have led to a Taxpayer Burden™, which is each taxpayer's share of city bills after its available assets have been tapped.

TIA's Taxpayer Burden™ measurement accounts for all assets and liabilities, including pension and retiree healthcare debt.

Nashville only has $3.2 billion of assets available to pay bills totaling $6.3 billion.

Because Nashville doesn't have enough money to pay its bills, it has a $3.1 billion financial hole. To erase this shortfall, each Nashville taxpayer would have to send $15,600 to the city.

Thanks to an accounting rule implemented in the 2015 fiscal year, Nashville must report its pension debt on its balance sheet. However, the city still excludes $1.7 billion of retirement obligations, which consist mostly of retiree healthcare liabilities. A new accounting standard will be implemented in the 2018 fiscal year that will require governments to report these liabilities on the balance sheet as well.

The city's financial report was released 123 days after its fiscal year end, which is considered timely according to the 180 day standard.

For information on the organization Truth in Accounting, follow this link. This information is irrefutable. It is not just an opinion. Nashville is just one bit of bad news away from a serious financial crisis. A national crisis that meant people traveled less, the loss of one of our sports franchises, a 2010 flood, or simply Nashville's time in the sun coming to and end and we could not pay our debts. For more information on the dire financial situation of Nashville, follow this link.

Top Stories

Councilman Robert Swope explain the latest developments at the Fairgrounds in radio interveiw.

Robert Swope

by Rod Williams, August 15, 2018 - Councilman Robert Swope was interviewed  on WTN 99.7 radio yesterday. He explained what is going on at the fairgrounds. This is insightful and informative. If you care about the future of he fairgrounds, you really need to hear this interview. Follow this link.

The interviewer ask Robert about a proposal to place a classic car action and a racing museum at the fairgrounds. There has been some concern expressed about these proposals.  Swope explains this is just talk at this point but if it comes to fruition It could be a good thing.

My view is that a proposed classic car auction operation at the fairgrounds would not be a detrimental development but a positive development and compatible with other uses at the fairgrounds. A race track hall of fame or museum could be a great addition. This is the first I had heard about a proposal for a classic car auction. Apparently, they bring in people from all over the country and are a really big deal.

I have heard this idea of a racing museum floated for a long time and think it would be a great addition.  It would be compatible with other Fairground uses and could make money for the Fairgrounds, and enhance its recognition. Nashville has a rich racing history and a museum to display that history and memorabilia would give tourist one more thing to see in Nashville. I think it would be a big hit, if done right, and am supportive. Swope points out that no one has proposed the city fund such a museum or a classic car auction and that these uses would not cost the taxpayers but make money for the city.

Swope reveals that  Speedway Motorsports, Inc  which owns Atlanta Motor Speedway, Bristol, Vegas, and other major speedways, has made a proposal to the city to invest millions in upgrading the speedway and leasing it from the city. Swope says the city will not give them "time of day."  This is a big deal. Speedway Motorsport is the largest player in the racetrack industry, yet the city is not even interested in talking to them. This is an outrage.

I am convinced the city insiders are determined to eventually get rid of the race track, the fair, and the flea market. I simply think they are embarrassed by those aspects of Nashville that reflect working-class or middle-class values or "old" Nashville. While in the last twenty years, Nashville movers and shakers have embraced Nashville as "Music City," for a very long time the same class of people who are embarrassed by flea markets and race tracks were embarrassed by country music. Flea markets and race tracks are not compatible with the hip vibe they want the "it" city to project.

Thanks to Robert Swope and others like Steve Glover, and before them, councilmen like Duane Dominy and Robert Duvall, the fairgrounds is still here. I think if the  ten acre giveaway occurs the days of the fairgrounds are numbered.

Top Stories

Nashville abortion clinic closing its doors! Hallelujah! Hallelujah!

Nashville abortion clinic closing its doors, leaving only one remaining in Nashville and only five in the state. Hallelujah!

Top Stories

Please donate and volunteer to stop Democrats from taking Tennesee.

From The Tennessee Republican Party:

Rod --
Tennessee’s Democratic Socialists Party has found a home in Tennessee. The party, whose members are referred to as "converts" who say they've been "radicalized" into socialism, have been welcomed into the Tennessee Democrat Party. That’s right, TNDP Chairwoman Mary Mancini recently announced that there is a place for Socialists in the Tennessee Democrat Party.

"We've got a big tent, and we are open to working with people that share our values," Mary Mancini, Tennessee Democratic Party chair, said. "We may not agree on everything 100 percent, but that's okay." 

Democrats Karl Dean and Phil Bredesen are running around Tennessee claiming to be moderate, but their own donors, supporters and state party are committed to the far left and liberal agenda of Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren. 

This is what we’re up against, wolves in sheep's clothing, and we NEED YOU to help us stop it. Will you donate or volunteer so that we make sure to elect our conservative Republicans up and down the ballot in November? We cannot do it without you. Support our fight to stop the efforts of Democrats to bring Socialism to America.

 Tennessee Republican Party
http://www.tngop.org/

Rod's Comment: I have made a contribution and urge readers of this blog to do so also.  I don't think it will happen but as of now Phil Bredesen leads Marsha Blackburn and in the race for govenor, Lee has only a 5 point lead over Karl Dean.  

While I have been critical from time to time of President Trump, I am pleased with most of his policies, with the exception of his start of a trade war, and I am not so certain that, that may not in fact turn out well. Bredesen was not a bad governor. However, if he is elected he will be voting to give the Democrats control of the Senate. It really doesn't matter how Bredesen votes on any one issue, Democrat control of the Senate means a reversal of the curtailment of Obamacare and most likely an advance toward single-payer health care, loss of future conservative Supreme Court appointees and a reversal of the tax cuts which has resulted in economic growth. The policies advanced under President Trump will be reversed. Much is at stake.

Also, at the State level, should Dean win, we can expect a reversal of the advances made under Governor Haslam and a Democrat win would give Democrats control of redistricting. We cannot afford to lose these elections and they are close.

If you can contribute, please do. Also, volunteer activity can be as important than money. The candidates need people door knocking and phone banking and many other task. Please, if you do not want Tennessee to turn "blue," please put your money and effort into stopping it from happening. Democrats are motivated. We must work hard to keep them from flipping Tennessee.

Top Stories

What happened at the Council meeting of Aug 7: Bird regs pass on 2nd, Donelson Transit deferred on 3rd, Proposed charter amendments deferred, Edge Hill overlay advances.

Above is the video of the Council meeting of August 8th.. To see my commentary on the agenda and a link to the agenda and the Council staff analysis follow this link.

At seven and half hours long, this is a long council meeting. The public hearing on zoning matters takes up the bulk of the meeting and the council does not get to the point of considering resolution until 5 hours into the meeting. I did not watch all of this meeting. I watched at double speed and skipped forward looking for the parts of interest. If you care that much and think I may have missed something important, then you may want to watch the meeting for yourself.

I am posting this report later than normally due to the video being posted later than normal and because I could not find the time to tackle watching this long meeting. By the time I got around to watching this meeting the minutes of the meeting were posted, so I consulted the meeting minutes to find out the outcome of some to the bills that interested me. To see the meeting minutes, follow this link.


Elections and Confirmation: There are 4 mayoral appointments to Boards and Commission before the Council for confirmation. They are all approved.

Resolutions and bills on public hearing: There are four resolution and seventeen bills on pubic hearing. The resolutions are requesting  exemptions from the minimum distance requirements for obtaining a beer permit. The bills are rezoning request or related zoning bills. I do not even attempt to understand the pros and cons of every zoning bill and they generally bore me and are of interest to only the people in the immediate vicinity of the rezoning.  I only call attention to bills that I think will have an impact beyond the immediate neighborhood or are bills that have already been to the Planning Commission and have been disapproved by the Planning Commission, or  for some other reason are of interest These are the ones of interest:

Bill BL2018-1245 which would apply a conservation overlay to 43 acres in the Edge Hill community is approved by a vote of 28 in favor, 5 opposed and 2 abstentions.  This is an attempt to slow the gentrification of this historically Black community near downtown west of 8th Ave., east of music row.  With this overlay in place most existing housing could not be torn down and where new construction was permitted, the new construction would have to comparable in style to the existing homes in the community. The community is deeply divided on this issue. The Planning Commission only approved this by a vote of 4 to 3 after two hours of heated public hearing. For more on the issue, read the Tennessean coverage, South Nashville community bitterly split over plan to restrict development and Metro Council back controversial plan.

To view the council deliberation and public hearing go to timestamp 12:37 in the video.  The first speaker in favor of this overlay is Walter Searcy, a prominent Black attorney with a checkered past. At timestamp 1:06:46 Carlos Deford Baily, grandson of iconic early Black county music artist Deford Bailey speaks in favor. One speaker admits and addresses that this community divide is a racial and socioeconomic divide to the dispute. She speaks with passion. At 1:10:34 those opposed to the overlay have their turn.While there may be a racial divide to this issue there were both Whites and Blacks speaking on both sides of the issue. A theme of those opposed is that the proponents distorted the degree of support and manipulated the appearance that the overlay is widely supported. One of the points that opponents make is that there are less restrictive overlay options to preserve the character of the community. The opponent end their time at the microphone at timestamp 2:36:18. A Planning Commission staff member then explains what is prohibited under the provisions of the overlay. After both sponsors Sledge and O'Connel offer there comments there is some limited Council discussion and then the vote is  taken.

Those voting in favor are Cooper, Mendes, Shulman, Hastings, Swope, Scott Davis, Withers, Anthony Davis, VanReece, Pridemore, Hagar, Glover, Huezo, Syracuse, Sledge, O'Connell, Roberts, Kindall, Mina Johnson, Murphy, Pulley, Elrod, Karen Johnson, Bedne, Dowell, Lee, Henderson, and Rosenberg; Voting "NO" are Hall, Haywood, Pardue, Freeman, and Blalock and voting to Abstain are Gilmore, and Hurt. The action on this bill ends at timestamp 2:49:43.

Bill BL2018-1275 and  Bill BL2018-1276 (as amended)  are related and are bills applying a Neighborhood Landmark Overlay District on property located at 1431 Shelton Avenue and rezoning the property from  R6 to MUN-A. This would allow a recording studio to operate in what is a residential community. This is a tool used to save old large homes that are too big for normal residential use and the economic activity is of a type that is low impact but many neighbors oppose this type arrangement. Neighborhood activist and former Metro Councilman John Summers speaks against the bill. To see the public hearing look at about timestamp 3:14. It passed by a vote of 25 to 5 to 4. To read The Tennessean's report on this issue see, Obscure zoning tool could legalize home studio in historic East Nashville home.

Bill BL2018-1280 approves the plans for a non-hazardous liquid waste processing facility to be located at 2832 Whites Creek Pike. This proves controversial. I did not delve into the issue deep enough to have an opinion. To see the public hearing and council deliberation see timestamp 3:50:18 - 5:06:08.  It was approved by a vote of 21 to 12 to 3.

Resolutions: There are 45 resolution on the agenda in addition to the resolutions on public hearing. Initially all resolutions except  resolutions on public hearing are on the consent agenda. A resolution stays on the consent agenda if it passes unanimously the committees to which it is assigned. Resolutions which receive negative votes in committee are pulled off of consent. Also any councilman may have a resolution pulled off of consent. Those remaining on consent are lumped together and passed by a single vote. Resolutions on the consent agenda are usually not controversial and tend to be routine matters, such as accepting grants from the Federal or State Government, entering into inter-agency agreements over mundane things, appropriating money from the 4% fund, settling lawsuits, or approving signs overhanging the sidewalk. Here are the resolution of interest:

Resolution RS2018-1314 proposes six charter amendments to be submitted to the voters for ratification. This will take 27 votes to be approved.

• Three of them are related the line of succession for the office of mayor and how a vacancy is filled. It also addresses how a district council vacancy would be filled and would shorten the time a district would go without having a council member. Some problems are pointed out with what is proposed related to the timing of elections. It is pointed out that the proposed amendment could mean someone is elected with only three months to serve and other people are pulling papers to run in the next general election.  Some change needs to be made to avoid an expensive runoff to fill the office of vice mayor as we are now experiencing.
• The fourth proposed amendment would require oaths of office for mayor, vice mayor, and members of council to include an oath to uphold the Charter of the Metropolitan Government of Nashville. Currently, such oaths reference only support of the Tennessee Constitution and the Constitution of the United States.
• The fifth proposed amendment would change the term limits for the offices of councilman and councilman at-large from two (2) terms to three (3) terms. It would also change “councilman” to “councilmember.” The attempt to expand term limits has been tried before and rejected by the voters.
• The sixth proposed amendment would update the Metropolitan Charter with general neutral references in place of masculine-only pronouns. References to “he” would be changed to “he or she,” “his” would be changed to “his or her,” “him” would be changed to “him or her,” “councilman” would be changed to “councilmember,” and “policemen”would be changed to “police officers.” 

Each of the proposed charter amendments must be considered individually, and each must garner 27 votes, then the total bill is moved as amended and must get 27 votes. A lot of work has gone into the proposals before it reaches the Council floor.  There is a Charter Revision Committee that considers the proposals before they reach the Council. The Council discussion never gets past the proposed second amendment concerning the filling of a vacancy of a district council seat. After discussion, Council Member Pridemore moved to defer the resolution, and the motion was seconded and approved by a  roll call vote. Due to the time frame by which a proposal to amend the charter must be passed in order for the election commission to be able to place the proposed charter amendments on the ballot, when this comes up next council meeting, it must pass or no charter amendments can be considered this year. To see the council deliberations see timestamp 5:22:11 to 5:23:24.

Resolution RS2018-1319  appropriates $551,051.45 in Community Development Block Grant funds for sidewalk improvements in North Nashville. This is money that could instead be used to leverage the building of units of affordable housing. This passed on the consent agenda.

Resolution RS2018-1328  would issue General Obligation bonds in the amount of $50 million, $25 million of which would be for demolition of existing fairgrounds buildings and $25 million would provide infrastructure for the proposed MLS stadium. There are also three bills pending also related to the fairgrounds land giveaway soccer deal and this was deferred to track with those bills.

Resolution RS2018-1329,  Resolution RS2018-1330, Resolution RS2018-1331, Resolution RS2018-1332, and Resolution RS2018-1333  each appropriates $200,000 from various departments of Metro Government to various selected non-profits. Some of these, such as the Oasis Center and St. Lukes and Nashville Adult Literacy Council, I am familiar with. Others such as Nations Ministry Center and Moves and Grooves, I have never heard of.  I do not approve of giving Metro Tax dollars to non-profits. If it s contract for a non-profit to provide a service that is one thing, but to just give various agencies money, I do not think is appropriate.

Conexion Americas is slated to get $50,000. While Conexion Americas does some worthwhile things, they also provide services to illegal aliens and advocate on behave of illegal aliens.

All of these pass.  The "no"votes are  Swope, Glover, Huezo, Freeman, and Roberts. To see the discussions see timestamp 5:55:12

Resolution RS2018-1356  by Steve Glover expresses the intention of the Metropolitan Council to suspend action on any agreement related to any lease and redevelopment of the Nashville Fairgrounds until all necessary procedures have been completed. This was deferred "by rule."

Bills on First reading: There are 24 bills on first reading. First reading is a formality that gets bills on the agenda and they are not considered by committee until after they pass first reading. They are all lumped together and pass by a single vote except in rare circumstances. I normally don't read them until they get to second reading. On this agenda there are several bills on First Reading related to the fairground. As is the norm all bills on first reading are lumped together and pass by a single vote.

Bills on Second Reading: There are eight. Here are the ones of interest.

Bill BL2018-1142  says that if a request for funds from the 4% fund is going to be spend in  single council district that that district councilman will be given advance notice. This sounds reasonable to me. It is approved by a voice vote.

Second Substitute Bill BL2018-1202 would regulate "shared urban mobility devices," such as bicycles and scooters, and if establish a permitting system for them. This was prompted by the arrival of Bird Scooter in Nashville. This would establish a one-year pilot program for the scooter, impose a lot of cost, including a $35 per scooter and a whole lot of regulation. My view is that this is overkill. There is a lot of discussion and then it is approved by a voice vote. To view the discussion see timestamp 6:15:35 to 6:56:30.

Bill BL2018-1281 would require sexual harassment awareness training of Metro employees and contractors. The staff analysis says we do not know how much this would cost and that HR does not have the resources to track compliance. It is deferred to the October 2nd meeting.

Bill BL2018-1283 essentially says that Metro cannot use the proceeds from sale of surplus property to balance the budget.  While it seems to make sense that one should not use one-time money to fund on-going cost, as we did this year, I am not sure that this flexibility should be taken away. There may be times when the city needs to do that. This was deferred at the request of the sponsor to the September 18th meeting.

Bills on Third Reading: There are 20. Most are approved zoning bills.

Bill 2016-219 to trample property rights and kill an affordable housing project deferred again.  I have posted separately on this issue. To learn more follow this link.

Substitute BL2018-1139 (as amended) is the Donelson Transit-Oriented Redevelopment Plan.   This has been worked on for a long time and is a complex bill. It would guide redevelopment around the Music City Star Donelson train stop and contains an affordable housing component. New authority from the state provides for this type of designation and this will be the first time that authority has been used.  This development hit a bureaucratic snag explained in this Tennessean article: $300M Donelson development stalled by oversight dispute.  For more on this complex bill, see the lengthy staff analysis. This bill is  amended on third reading to change the composition of the advisory board. This bill was deferred by a roll call vote over the objection of the sponsor. To see the discussion see timestamp 7:07:55- 7:19:34

Bill BL2018-1182 is a disapproved rezoning bill in Councilman Karen Johnson's district.  I am only calling attention to the bill because it is disapproved and will require 27 votes to pass. It passes.

Top Stories