Garber: MLS, Nashville ownership discussed 'plan B' if stadium was rejected
Top Stories
A right-leaning disgruntled Republican comments on the news of the day and any other thing he damn-well pleases.
As everyone who cares knows already, at the last council meeting legislation was passed that approved the building of the MLS stadium and the giveaway of ten acres of fairground property to the developer. This action required the passage of several pieces of legislation. The most crucial of the votes was the vote on Substitute Bill BL2018-1289 which approved the demolition of certain buildings and structures
necessary for the construction of a new Major League Soccer Stadium and the imposing of a privilege tax on the sale of tickets to events at the new
Major League Soccer Stadium.
The reason this was the most crucial vote is because the vote on this bill was the best chance opponents of the fairground giveaway had to stop it from happening. Both provisions in this bill, the demolition and the privilege tax, required 27 positive votes to be approved. All of the other pieces of legislation only required a simple majority. On second reading the bill failed to get 27 votes. On second reading only 24 voted in favor, seven voted against, eight abstained, and one member did not vote. Since the bill required 27 votes to pass on final reading an abstention or not voting was as good as a "no" vote.
Unfortunately, between second reading and final reading some council members had their arms twisted, were somehow bought off, or were persuaded in their own mind by the preponderance of the arguments that the MLS stadium and fairground giveaway was a good deal. The final vote was 31 in favor and eight "no" votes and no abstaining votes and no one not voting.
Below is a list of those who voted "yes" in favor of the bill and third and final reading. I have highlighted in red those who were "No" votes, "abstain" votes or not voting when the bill was on second reading. In other words, these are the people who switched sides.
Yes (31):
Allen, Gilmore, Mendes, Hurt, Shulman, Hastings, Robert Swope, Scott Davis,
Withers, Anthony Davis, VanReece, Pridemore, Rhoten, Syracuse, Freeman,
Sledge, O'Connell, Roberts, Kindall, Weiner, Mina Johnson, Murphy,
Pulley, Elrod, Blalock, Vercher, Potts, Bedne, Dowell, Lee, and
Rosenberg.
Hall and Haywood were "yes" votes on second reading who switched to "No." They switch from being in favor of the fairground giveaway to opposing it. Robert Swope is the most surprising of all of those who switched side from a vote against the giveaway by voting "abstain" on second reading to a "yes" on third reading. I have asked him to explain his vote. When I get a reply, I will post it.
Here is who voted "no" on third reading, the vote that really mattered on the only bill that had a chance of stopping the fairground giveaway. No (8): John Cooper, Johnathan Hall, Brenda Haywood, Doug Pardue, Larry Hagar, Steve Glover,Holly Huezo, and Angie Henderson. These brave soles who voted "no" need a thank you. For their contact information, click on their name below the picture. For contact information of other council members, follow this link. Also, if you are unsure of which district you live in, follow this link and look to the top right of the page for the "Council District Lookup" tool.
John Cooper At-large |
Brenda Haywood District 3 |
Jonathan Hall District 1 |
Doug Pardue District 10 |
Larry Hagar District 11 |
Steve Glover District 12 |
Holly Huezo District 13 |
Angie Henderson District 34 |
On the agenda are:
- 917 Society
- Americans for Prosperity
- Evann Freeman - Marsha Blackburn's Campaign
- David Birdsong - Campaign
From 2nd Vote - United Way is the world’s largest privately funded non-profit organization and raises over $5 billion every year. Across the United States, a coalition of 1,129 United Way
chapters partner with businesses, civic organizations, educational
institutions, healthcare providers and more with many decisions made on
the local level. United Way claims neutrality on the Life issue, but many chapters have financially supported Planned Parenthood programs. According to United Way’s own admission, an estimated 5-6% of local chapters have financial ties.
In 2015, 2nd Vote created the Pro-Life Guide to United Way
to provide conservatives with a free resource that shows which chapters
do contribute to Planned Parenthood. The latest update with the most
recent publicly available financial documents show 62 United Way
affiliates donating to the abortionist. Our research team updates the
information each year and has linked the supporting documentation.
Recently, United Way updated a position statement dismissing affiliate support for Planned Parenthood as “only a small number.” Well, if a Planned Parenthood abortion costs up to $950,
the $2.7 million funneled through United Way would pay for at least
2,901 procedures in a single year. Does that sound like “only a small
number” to you?