Top Stories
Thursday, March 01, 2018
The Tennessean calls for Mayor Barry to resign
Top Stories
Monday, February 19, 2018
‘Resign Now! Megan Barry’ Rally Set for Tomorrow at Metro Nashville Courthouse
A rally calling on Mayor Megan Barry to resign “effective immediately” will take place tomorrow, Tuesday, February 20, at 5 p.m., on the south side steps of the Metro Nashville Davidson Courthouse.
Top Stories
Monday, February 12, 2018
Vice mayor appoints members of special committee to investigate Mayor Barry
Erica Gillmore At-large |
Bob Mendes At-large |
council members Brenda Haywood, Burkley Allen, Mina Johnson, Russ Pulley and Robert Swope.
Brenda Haywood District 3 |
Robert Swope District 4 ; |
Russ Pulley District 25 |
To read The Tennessean's report on this development, follow this link.
WSMV coverage is at this link.
Mina Johnson District 23 |
Burkley Allen District 18 |
Top Stories
Saturday, February 10, 2018
Which Council members voted for and which voted against investigating Mayor Barry
On February 6th the Council passes Resolution RS2018-1039, a resolution to establish a Special Committee to investigate the circumstances surrounding Mayor Barry's sexual affair with a subordinate and to look into travel and other expenses, including overtime expenses to determine if there was an improper use of public money.
Council Member Vercher requested a suspension of the rules to allow the resolution to be heard and no objections were made. After some discussion the resolution passed. The vote was 30 "yes," 7 "no", and no abstentions and none not voting.
Jim Shulman, At-large DeCosta Hastings, District 1 Brenda Haywood, District 2
Robert Swope, District 4 Scott Davis, District 5 Doug Pardue, District 10
Larry Hagar, District 11 Steve Glover, District 12 Holly Huezo, District 13
Keven Rhoten, District 14 Jeff Syracuse, District 15 Mike Freeman, District 16
Colby Sledge, District 17 Freedie O'Connell, District 19 Mary Carolyn Roberts, District 20
Sheri Weiner, District 22 Mina Johnson, District 23 Kathleen Murphy, District 24
Jeremy Elrod, District 26 Davette Blalock, District 27 Tanaka Vercher, District 28
Karen Johnson, District 29 Jason Potts, District 30 Jacobia Dowell, District 32
Angie Henderson, District 34 Dave Rosenberg, District 35
Bill Pridemore, District 9 Burkely Allen, District 18 Russ Pulley, District 25 Fabian Bedne, District 31
If you are unsure who is your council member, you can use this look-up tool at this link. In looking for factions or voting patterns, one should use caution in reading too much into the way members vote on an issue especially when the vote is so lopsided. However, I observe that all of the Black members of the Council voted for the investigation, the four identified Republican members of the Council voted for the investigation. The two openly homosexual members of the Council voted against the investigation. There was no pattern to the way female councilmen voted, some voted for the investigation and some against.
Top Stories
Friday, February 09, 2018
How to impeach the mayor
by Rod Williams - The Metro Charter does not use the term "impeach" but it provides for removal from office by "ouster" or "recall."
To recall the mayor a petition must be signed by by 15% of the the qualified voters in Davidson County. That would be a difficult number to achieve. There are about 420,000 registered voters in the County so a recall petition would require a petition signed by 63,000 voters. In the election of September, 2015 which elected Mayor Barry, there were 374,209 registered voters. Of that number, 110,894 voted in that election which was 29.63% of the eligible voters. Megan Barry received 60,519 votes. (I have requested the exact number of registered voters from the Election Commission and will update this post when provided with that information.)
A notice of the intention to obtain signatures for a recall petition must be filed with the metropolitan clerk prior to
obtaining signatures of registered qualified voters and the required number of registered voters must be filed with the clerk no later than thirty days following the date the notice is filed.
Once the petition is submitted, the Election Commission will verify the signatures. If the petition does contain a sufficient number of good names, then an election will be held to elect a successor.
The recall election would not be a yes or no vote on ousting Mayor Barry but would be an election. Mayor Barry's name would automatically be on the ballot along with others who qualify to run. Like any other election, the person getting the majority wins. If Mayor Barry should win she would continue to serve as mayor. If no one gets a majority, there would be a runoff. For more information on this, see the Metro Charter sections 15.05 thorough section 15.09.
Ouster is judicial process described in state law and is available to any municipality and the process is described in Tennessee Code Annotated, sections 8. A person may be removed from office "who shall knowingly or willfully commit misconduct in office," or who fails to perform their duties or is drunk in public or does a couple other things.
The attorney general may initiate the ouster proceeding or may do so in response to a complaint, but it is up to the attorney general except when the governor directs the AG to start ouster proceedings. The AG may call witnesses and gather testimony and then he presents a case to a jury. If the defendant is found guilty, they are removed from office.
Top Stories
Wednesday, February 07, 2018
What happened at the Feb. 6th Council meeting: investigating the mayor, Tax 4 Tracks with $8.9B price tag, even more $ for General Hospital.
by Rod Williams - The council meeting of February 6th had lots of interesting discussion involving several very important
issues. I will summarize those first. If you are going
to actually watch the full meeting you need an agenda and the council staff
analysis. Without a program you really will not know what is going on.
To access the agenda, staff analysis and my commentary on the agenda,
follow this link.
Council moves to investigate the mayor.
Resolution 1039 was a late resolution to investigate Mayor Barry and was approved by a roll call
vote.
An objection from two members could have stopped the resolution from being considered. Several members speak in favor of the resolution stressing the obligation of the legislative branch of the government to protect the tax payers interest. Opponents argue that the TBI and other bodies are investigation the mayor and this investigation is unnecessary. Those arguments, I thought, were very lame and they were adequately countered. The motion required
30 votes to pass and got the sufficient number of votes. The
investigation will be limited in scope and look at the issue of miss use
of public funds. To watch the debate see time stamp 1:41:24 to 2:28:26. See a following post on this blog for the result of the roll call vote of 30 to 7.
Tax for Tracks passes, headed to referendum with a $8.9 Billion price tag language.
- Increasing the sales tax rate from 9.25% to 9.75% in July 2018 and to 10.25% percent in 2023. This would be the highest sales tax rate in the nation.
- A surcharge on the hotel-motel tax which by 2023 would be 6.375%, one of the highest in the nation.
- A 20% surcharge added to the local car rental tax making that tax 1.2%.
- A 20 percent increase in the city’s business and excise tax.
Even More money approved for General Hospital. $17,141,000.
Resolution RS2018-1032 which would appropriate an additional $13,231,000 to support General Hospital is substituted to increase the funding to $17.14 million. This is still short of the additional $19.7 million the hospital says it needs. The extra $3.9 million in the substitute is coming from the city's "undesignated fund balance," which serves as a rainy day fund for the city. Of the $13.2 million in the original resolution, $10.83 million comes from the undesignated fund balance of the General Fund and the remaining $2.4 million comes from impounded funds from six different expenditure accounts including an account for storm water management and an account to incentivize the construction of affordable housing. The total now to come out of the undesignated fund balance will reduce that fund balance to less than five percent of the city's general operating budget. This is irresponsible and will be the first time thus has happened in nearly a decade.
The substitute removes the hiring freeze called for in the original resolution and also calls for the creation of a strategic planning committee to consider the future of General Hospital. For a good understanding of this issue, you may want to watch the video and see staff attorney Jamison's explanation. For a deep understanding of this complicated issue you may want to watch the Budget and Finance Committee meeting of Monday where the Council spend three hours garbling with this issue and drafting the substitute. The Council approved the resolution as substituted by a vote of 36 in favor, none opposed and two abstentions. To view the discussion on the resolution see the video at timestamp 59.31 to 1:48:42.
Earlier this year, the mayor showed courage in proposing to change General Hospital from a hospital to an outpatient facility but then she buckled to pressure and retreated. Since that did not happen, if I were serving in the Council, I would have supported this resolution. Council has little choice but to spend this money. Until such time as we close General Hospital it will continue to be a drain on the city's resources. If kept open, it must pays its employees and pay its bills.
General Hospital has been a money pit for generations. In the last two years the Hospital has received $26 million in emergency funding in addition to a $35 million annual subsidy from the Metro Council. As reported in The Tennessean recently, a recent audit found that the hospital, "failed at basic bookkeeping, unable to keep track of patient payments and major expenses."
While poor management is obviously a problem, the real problem with Nashville General is that no one wants to go there. Metro jail inmates without insurance needing hospitalization have no choice and are sent to General and there is a financial incentive for Metro employees to use General but it still cannot fill its beds. The facility is licensed for 150 beds, staffed for 114 and has an average of 44 beds filled a day. Metro General should have been closed fifty years ago. Ever since the advent of Medicaid there has been no need for a city charity hospital and the reason it has been kept open is purely political. There is no federal or state law or metro charter provision requiring the city to operate a charity hospital. The reason General Hospital is kept open is because it is a source of prestige for the Black community.
While this action puts a band-aid on the problem of General Hospital, the problem does not go away. This shifting of funding and dangerously dipping into the undesignated fund balance will complicate the upcoming development of a city budget. I fear the solution will be a tax increase.
There was another bill concerning General Hospital, Bill BL2018-1055 on second reading which would protect General Hospital from being downgraded to an out patient facility only and would provide that until June 30, 2019, the mayor may not terminate any agreement between Metro and the Metro Hospital Authority without prior approval of the Metro Council by resolution. This bill also passed, passing by a voice vote. While I would have reluctantly supported the resolution, if I had a vote, I would have opposed the bill.
In Other Council Action
Following the prayer and pledge, the first order of business is confirmation of mayoral appointments to boards and commissions. No surprises and no drama. One person withdrew his name from consideration and the others were approved. Bills on First Reading pass by a single vote without discussion as is the norm.
Public hearing on zoning and planning bills bore me, as I am sure they do most people not directly affected. I don't even try to form an opinion on each of these bills and zip though that part of the council meeting at double speed. I am calling attention to those that generated controversy or for some other reason I found of interest.
Resolution RS2018-999 is a resolution that approved a beer permit for an establishment that already has a liquor license. This is for an establishment in Germantown. Concern is expressed that this will be a beer garden type establishment that will generate a lot of business and is out of character for the community. It is approved.
Bill BL2018-1043 is a bill disapproved by the Planning Commission to rezone property at 5200 Nolensville Pike in Councilman Davette Blalock's district. On final reading a disapproved bill requires 27 votes. Only one person speaks against it. There is a roll call vote of 26 in favor, 3 opposed and 6 abstentions.
Bill BL2018-1051 removes the Adult Entertainment Overlay for a bunch of parcels in Councilman O'Connel's district. The Planning Commission has approved the bill so apparently there are no legal problems with doing this. No one speaks on it and it passes.There are 17 resolution on the agenda and they are all routine things such as accepting grants, paying settlements and approving of signs to overhang the right of way. These are the only two of interest:
Resolution RS2018-1022 spends $15.3 million out of the General Fund Reserve Fund (4% Fund) for various purchases for 15 departments. It includes $534,000 for Municipal Auditorium. With the large number of music venue's and sports facilities in town of various sizes, I question if the city still needs to be in the auditorium business. The bill is amended to take out the project that would fund the street salt bin relocation located in west Nashville over concern about the city's plan for the future use of that property. Apparently members of the Council were not consulted about this prior to the filing of the resolution. The resolution passes.Bill BL2017-790 on second reading would revisit the issue of insurance benefits provided to previous members of the Metro Council.This is deferred one meeting.
Resolution RS2018-1038 is a memorizing resolution requesting the Tennessee Department of Transportation to consider neighbors’ concerns and prioritize certain features during the improvements scheduled along Interstate 440. Included in this resolution is a request that more sound barriers be build along 1-440. As I understand it, I-440 is to have an additional lane added going in both directions. When I-440 was finally approved after being delayed for years it was supposed to be a "parkway." Originally trucks were not going to be allowed to use it, but that did not last long. In my view, no changes should be allowed to be made to I-440 without mitigating the effect of those changes to the neighborhoods though which this freeway passes. A resolution of this nature has no legal impact and just expresses an opinion. It passes on the consent agenda.
Top Stories
The Mayor Megan Barry scandal is national news
Living in Nashville and consuming local news one may not realize that the scandal involving Mayor Barry's affair with a subordinate and misuse of public funds to facilitate the affair is national news and even international news, but it is. There is not much insight to be gained from reading about it in other newspapers, most are apparently just a repackaging of The Tennessean's reporting, but it is interesting to see the twist other outlets put on the story. One source said it was like an episode of Nashville, the prime time soap opera. Others point out she is Nashville's first women mayor and her progressive politics. One source describe her as "one of the Democratic Party's brightest Southern stars."
The Story has been carried by AP, AOL.com, ABC, CNN, Fox News, The Washington Post, Fortune magazine, and UK's Daily Mail. The Daily Mail story had several pictures and video clips. Here are some excerpts from other news sources carrying the story:
The New York Times: ‘I Know That God Will Forgive Me,’ the Nashville Mayor Says. But Will the Voters?
Mayor Megan Barry, the first woman to lead this city, has been the kind
of politician who seemed to effortlessly reflect the tenor of her place
and time. Like others in booming Nashville, she is an ambitious
transplant, socially liberal but business-friendly, a non-Southerner
comfortable in a Southern context. It is a formula that has earned her
poll numbers that would be the envy of any politician.
But in recent days, scandal has threatened to dim one of the Democratic Party’s brightest Southern stars. ....
Hollywood Live: Megan Barry: 5 Things To Know About The Married Nashville Mayor Who Admitted To Having An Affair.
(more to come)
Top Stories
Tuesday, February 06, 2018
Metro Council votes to investigate Mayor Barry!
Resolution 1039 to investigate Mayor Barry was approved by a roll call vote. Watching live, I failed to get the exact vote tally, but it passed. Seven members voted "no" and none abstained. The motion required 30 votes to pass and got a sufficient number of votes. The investigation will be limited in scope and look at the issue of miss use of public funds.
Top Stories
What's on the Council agenda for Feb. 6, 2018: Investigating the mayor's affair, tax for tracks, more $ for General Hospital.
By Rod Williams - The
Metro Council will meet Tuesday, February 6, 2018 at 6:30 PM in the
Council chamber at the Metro Courthouse. The hottest topic of the meetings is a resolution to launch a council investigation of Mayor Barry related to her affair and the apparent misuse of public funds to facilitate the affair. The other hot items is the mayor's
transit program. There is also a bill to spend more money on General Hospital. If you are going to watch the
Council meeting, you need a copy of the Council agenda
and the staff analysis or you really will not know what is
going on. You can get the agenda and analysis at the highlighted links.
Investigating the Mayor
Romantic Greece - three days and nothing to do. |
The resolution will call on the Vice Mayor to appoint the committee's members. The committee would have the authority to subpoena witnesses and compel them to testify under oath. This charter provision authorizing such an investigation has never been used. Since the resolution is a late resolution it will require suspension of the rules to be considered. The sponsor will get to state the reason for considering a late resolution but that motion to introduce a late resolution is not debatable. It takes only two votes to deny the resolution being considered. If it is blocked, it will be on the agenda for the February 20th council meeting. If considered it would require 30 votes to be adopted. I suspect at least two members will vote to block it.
The mayor's tax for tracks plan
Bill BL2017-1031 on third reading is the bill to adopt the Mayor's transit improvement program and requesting the Davidson County Election Commission to call a county-wide referendum election to be held on May 1, 2018 to approve the tax increases to support the program.
As expected, this passed when on second reading. Also when on second reading it was amended to modify the language of the referendum. The current language will make the plan more attractive by distorting the facts. It was amended to require that the language of the referendum not say that the vote is a vote increasing the sales tax to 10.25% but instead to say the vote is a vote to increase the local option sales tax to 3.25%. While that is technically correct it is deceptive. The vote by the public in referendum will be increasing only the local option, not the state sales tax. However, when the public votes on this, if they they vote for the referendum, they will be voting to raise the total sales tax to 10.25%, making Nashville's sales tax the highest in the nation. I bet most people could not tell you which portion of the sales tax is state and which is local. The deceptive language was approved by a voice vote with some audible "no's"when on second.
When on second reading Councilman Cooper proposed an amendment that would require that the public referendum language state that the project would cost $8.952 billion. The referendum was to state that the project is a $5 billion project. The $8.952 billion figure is a figure stated in the project plan and is the estimated cost of the plan over the 15-year construction period. The $5 billion dollar figure is some of the cost expressed in current dollars. Cooper's amendment failed and the language of the referendum will use the deceptive lower figure of $5 billion. That is what is before the body.
Cooper's amendment would have also revealed the amount of the total sales tax if the referendum is approved instead of just the local share of the total which is 3.25%. His amendment would have had the referendum state the local option would increase to 3.25% for a total sales tax rate of 10.25%. Cooper's amendment was tabled by a vote of 21 in favor of tabling, 14 against, one abstention and three not voting. The bill was then voted on and passes by a vote of 30 to 5.
To better understand the bill, see page 13-21 of the staff analysis. Also for more information see this link and this link. To view the Council debate when the bill was on second reading see the video at timestamp 43:28 to 1:10:47 at this link.
While I think the odds favor this bill passing, I do not think that is assured. One reason is that the mayor has been weakened by the recent scandal involving her sexual affair with an employee and the misuse of public funds to facilitate that affair. She has lost influence. Another reason is that President Trump has revealed more details of his proposed infrastructure plan and we can no longer assume that $1.5 billion will come from the federal government (link). That now seems highly unlikely. Also, people are just now becoming aware of the negatives regarding this plan and some of the opposition may reach council members.
In a previous post I had erroneously stated that in order to pass the bill required two-thirds vote of the body which is 27 votes. Actually, it requires only a simply majority of the votes cast. I was relying on what I thought I knew and did not look it up. I regret the error.
State law requires the proposed ballot language to be approved 75 to 90 days prior to a scheduled referendum election, so the February 6, 2018 Council meeting would be the latest meeting at which the ordinance could be adopted for a May 1, 2018 referendum election. If not acted upon, then the next opportunity for a public referendum would by August which will be a more important election with greater turn out and will lessen the likelihood that the plan would be approved in referendum.
More money for General Hospital and protecting General
Resolution RS2018-1032 would appropriate an additional $13,231,000 from the General Fund to support General Hospital. This has to come from the General Fund not the 4% reserve fund. The 4% fund can only be used for equipment purchases and repairs. In the past the Council has been able to constantly give more and more money to our failing charity hospital without it hurting. This time, we are out of money and in order to fund this subsidy the city has to take money from other places. One of those places is the fund that was to incentivize private developers to build affordable housing. Instead of taking money from other places the city could draw down more money in the general fund but this would be poor money management and probably result in a lowering of the city's bond rating.
General Hospital has been a money pit for generations. In the last two years the Hospital has received $26 million in emergency funding in addition to a $35 million annual subsidy from the Metro Council. As reported in The Tennessean recently, a recent audit found that the hospital, "failed at basic bookkeeping, unable to keep track of patient payments and major expenses."
While poor management is obviously a problem, the real problem with Nashville General is that no one wants to go there. Metro jail inmates without insurance needing hospitalization have no choice and are sent to General and there is a financial incentive for Metro employees to use General but it still cannot fill its beds. The facility is licensed for 150 beds, staffed for 114 and has an average of 44 beds filled a day. Metro General should have been closed fifty years ago. Ever since the advent of Medicaid there has been no need for a city charity hospital and the reason it has been kept open is purely political. There is no federal or state law or metro charter provision requiring the city to operate a charity hospital. The reason General Hospital is kept open is because it is a source of prestige for the Black community.
Earlier this year, the mayor showed courage in proposing to change General Hospital from a hospital to an outpatient facility but then she buckled to pressure and retreated. Since this supplemental funding bill requires taking money from other programs, there may be push back but really the Council has little choice but to spend this money. Until such time as we close General Hospital it will continue to be a drain on the city's resources. If kept open, it must pays its employees and pay its bills.
There is another bill concerning General Hospital, Bill BL2018-1055 on second reading which would protect General Hospital from being downgraded to an out patient facility only and would provide that until June 30, 2019, the mayor may not terminate any agreement between Metro and the Metro Hospital Authority without prior approval of the Metro Council by resolution.This is very disappointing. This bill needs to be defeated. I am very disappointing to see that Councilman Steve Glover is one of the sponsors of this bill.
Other agenda items:
There are 17 mayoral appointees to Boards and Commission on the agenda for confirmation and as always they will be affirmed.
There is one resolution and 17 bills on public hearing. Items on public hearings are all rezoning bills or related to planning and zoning policy. Rezoning hearings bore me and I don't even try to form an opinion on the merits each rezoning bill before the Council. Rezoning bills usually are of interest only to people who live near the proposed rezoning. People who don't care one way or the other do not show up and with rare exceptions the only people who speak in favor of rezoning bills are those who will benefit from the rezoning such as the property owner or the developer. Opponents always make the same argument which boils down to one of these: 1) the change will result in stressing the infrastructure such as too much traffic on the roadway or overcrowd the schools, 2) will cause flooding, and 3) will change for the worse the character of the community. If you are interested in knowing what is permitted in different zoning districts, follow this link. I call attention to only those bills on public hearing that for some reason I expect to be controversial or to bills which have been disapproved by the Planning Commission. A bill disapproved by the Planning Commission requires 27 votes to be approved on third and final reading and sometimes that can be difficult to obtain.
There are 38 bills on first reading. First reading is a formality that gets bills on the agenda and they are not considered by committee until after they pass first reading. Normally bills on First Reading are all lumped together and pass by a single vote. It is rare that a bill on First Reading is voted on separately. I normally do not read bills until they get to second reading.
There are 17 resolution on the agenda and all are on the consent agenda at this time. A resolution stays on the consent agenda if it passes unanimously the committees to which it was assigned. Resolutions which receive negative votes in committee are pulled off of consent. Also any councilman may have a resolution pulled off of consent. Those remaining on consent are lumped together and passed by a single vote. Resolutions on the consent agenda are usually not controversial and tend to be routine matters, such as accepting grants from the Federal or State Government, entering into inter agency agreements over mundane things, appropriating money from the 4% fund, settling lawsuits, or approving signs overhanging the sidewalk. Unlike a bill which requires three votes of the Council to pass, a resolution only requires one vote of the Council.
Below are additional items of interest:
Bill BL2018-1043 on pubic hearing is disapproved bill to rezone property at 5200 Nolensville Pike in Councilman Davette Blalock's district.
Bill BL2018-1051 on public hearing would remove the Adult Entertainment Overlay for a bunch of parcels in Councilman O'Connel's district. The Planning Commission has approved the bill so apparently there are no legal problems with doing this. No one wants a strip club in their community but while they can be regulated, they cannot be banned. The staff analysis does not review this bill and I have no specific insight on this but am simply calling attention to it. Zoning cannot be used as a means for banning an activity people do not like. Nashville has pretty much regulated strip clubs out of existence. At one time, Nashville had dozens of such establishments but now only a handful of tame clubs remain. If this bill has the effect of making it impossible for a strip club to find a location to operate, then it may result in legal challenges. I am not an attorney and there may be no problem but again there may be, I don't know.
Resolution RS2018-1022 spends $15.3 million out of the General Fund Reserve Fund (4% Fund) for various purchases for 15 departments. This is nothing out of the ordinary and I assume the Mayor's office and the Council's Budget and Finance committee do their job and all of this spending is proper. One expenditure I hopes gets close scrutiny is $534,000 for Municipal Auditorium. With the large number of music venue's and sports facilities in town of various sizes, I question if the city still needs to be in the auditorium business.
Resolution RS2018-1038 is a memorizing resolution requesting the Tennessee Department of Education to consider neighbors’ concerns and prioritize certain features during the improvements scheduled along Interstate 440. Included in this resolution is a request that more sound barriers be build along 1-440. As I understand it, I-440 is to have an additional lane added going in both directions. When I-440 was finally approved after being delayed for years it was supposed to be a "parkway." Originally trucks were not going to be allowed to use it, but that did not last long. In my view, no changes should be allowed to be made to I-440 without mitigating the effect of those changes to the neighborhoods though which this freeway passes.
Bill BL2017-790 on second reading would revisit the issue of benefits provided to previous members of the Metro Council. Former Metro Council members get a very generous benefit in the form of lifetime metro insurance at the same rate as a retired metro employee. In the interest of full disclosure, I get this benefit myself. I do not thing we should. At the time this was awarded, there were no term limits and usually council members served for a long time and there were few former council members and council members tended to be older when they left office. It did not cost a lot. Now, there are lots of former council members. This was last before the Council in July 2017 and at that time was deferred indefinitely at the recommendation of the committees which considered the bill. To consider this bill the Council would have to vote to override the previous committee recommendations. That is not likely to happen in which case, the bill must permanently be removed from the agenda.
Top Stories
Friday, February 02, 2018
Mayor, bodyguard lingered on taxpayer-funded trips after public events
Romantic Greece- three nights with nothing to do. |
bodyguard stayed on taxpayer-funded trips for days after completing city business. (link)
Top Stories
Nashville council may seek special committee with subpoena power to investigate Mayor Barry's travel with bodyguard
Nashville council may seek special committee with subpoena power to investigate Mayor Barry's travel with bodyguard.
by Joey Garrison, USA Today Network - Tennessee - ... Budget and Finance Committee chairwoman Tanaka Vercher said she plans
to file a resolution that would appoint a committee of three to seven
council members to oversee the investigation,... charter gives the council the power ... If two council members object, the resolution would not make it on Tuesday's agenda but be taken up Feb. 20 instead. ....three-fourths of the council, or 30 votes, is required to create the special committee. ... power to conduct investigations has never been invoked by the council....
Top Stories
Was Mayor Barry having inappropriate sexual relationships with multiple Metro employees?
This is strange. I would not expect that Mayor Barry was having a sexual relationship with more than one employee but apparently from what attorney says such is being alleged. She has hired the law firm Barrett Johnston Martin & Garrison LLC to represent her. Here is the letter from her attorney in which he denies she was having inappropriate relationships with multiple Metro employees.
Top Stories
Thursday, February 01, 2018
D.A. asks TBI to investigate Mayor Barry’s spending
WSMV News 4
NASHVILLE, TN (WSMV) -District Attorney General Glenn Funk has asked the
TBI to investigate whether Nashville Mayor Megan Barry or others
violated any criminal law, according to a statement from the D.A.’s
office.
TBI investigates Mayor Megan Barry affair for possible criminal conduct upon Nashville DA's request
by Dave Boucher, USA TODAY NETWORK - Tennessee - ... Records show the pair went on nine trips together between January and October 2017, including a trip to Athens, Greece for seven days.
Top Stories
Wednesday, January 31, 2018
Mayor Barry should resign!
Should Mayor Barry resign? Mayor Megan Barry has admitted to having an affair with the police officer in charge of her security detail. In today's climate of "me-too," if the genders were reversed it would be considered sexual harassment. It wouldn't matter if no pressure was exerted to coerce the other person to enter into the affair, the power imbalance alone would be sufficient to make the more powerful person guilty of sexual harassment. What is fair for the goose is fair for the gander. Mayor Barry should resign!
Top Stories
Tuesday, November 14, 2017
Mayor Barry Letter to Council Regarding Meharry Medical College and Nashville General Hopsital
Last Thursday, Mayor Barry announced plans to phase out General Hospital as a hospital and instead turn it into an ambulatory surgical care center,
which would provide only outpatient services. She has been criticized for not giving the Metro Hospital Authority nor the Health and Hospitals Committee of the Council advance notice. I can understand those in the Council or on the Hospital Authority for feeling blindsided, yet I applaud her for taking bold action. Advance notice would have only given those who oppose this action time to rally, demonstrate and organize. There will still be plenty of time for that as this move will not take effect until sometime next fiscal year.
For a very long time, Metro General has been a money pit, that cannot fill its beds and there is no charter requirement or state law requirement requiring the city to maintain a charity hospital. This should been done a long time ago.
Below is a copy of the letter Mayor Barry sent to the Council explaning her actions. The highlighting in the letter is mine.
November 9, 2017
Dear Vice Mayor Briley and Council Members:
I want to let you know about an important change in the relationship between Nashville General Hospital and Meharry Medical College and plans for reconfiguring the hospital’s operating model to make it more financially stable.
Meharry, a historically black medical college, has trained doctors to provide care throughout our nation, including in many underserved areas, for more than 140 years. Nashville General has served as the index teaching hospital for Meharry since 1992, giving medical students invaluable experience working with patients from across our community. However, Nashville General’s current daily census is about one-third of its licensed capacity. Only about 40 of its 120 beds are being used on an average day, and 20 percent of those are part of an inmate care contract. Meharry currently has to pay to send students to other states in order to get the experience necessary to enter the medical profession.
As a result, Meharry, which owns the building in which Nashville General operates, needs access to a local hospital serving a greater number of patients in order to make its educational program the best it can be. Today Meharry announced that it will partner with Nashville-based HCA’s TriStar Southern Hills Medical Center, giving the nation’s premier hospital company access to some of the best and brightest young minds the medical community has to offer.
This is also an opportune time to revisit Nashville General’s operating model, which has proven fiscally unsustainable, and restructure it in a way that will promote better health care outcomes for residents in North Nashville and across our city. Since 2005, Metro has provided more than half a billion dollars to support the operations of Nashville General, while the number of patients being served has decreased. I believe we can invest our resources more strategically to provide for the health care needs of our city’s indigent population, while maintaining operations at Nashville General Hospital.
With the help of restructuring specialist Kevin Crumbo, who has donated hundreds of hours of his time, the Metro Hospital Authority and my administration have been exploring ways to improve Nashville General’s long-term outlook. It’s time for a new model, one that will be focused on preventing people from needing in-patient services while ensuring that the patients currently using Nashville General for their outpatient health care needs, which amounts to more than 90% of the total patient visits, will still receive the same – or better – care at this facility.
Later this year, my administration will submit to the Council a substantial request for supplemental funds to stabilize Nashville General’s fiscal situation so the hospital can continue to provide services and meet its financial obligations for the rest of this budget year. Meanwhile, we will work with stakeholders throughout the upcoming budget cycle toward a goal of refocusing Nashville General Hospital’s operations to an ambulatory care model that provides high-quality clinic and other outpatient care services.
We also will create an indigent care fund to ensure that all patients who are currently using Nashville General will still have their health care needs met either at Nashville General or at other area hospitals. This will result in better health care outcomes for the patient population being served.
As a city, we are financially committed to promoting better health results and health care operations. We can restructure that commitment in a way that results in the best health care outcomes for residents while providing a more stable funding model that won’t require Metro to sacrifice services in other areas of government, or possibly raise taxes, in order to provide that quality care.
As I’ve said many times, I am committed to safety-net care in our community. This will take all of us, working in good faith and with good intentions, to create a successful new model for Nashville General Hospital. My administration and Meharry Medical College are absolutely committed to working with community stakeholders to do just that. I know we’re up to the task, and I appreciate your partnership as we take on this important work.
Kind regards,
Megan Barry
Mayor
For more on this issue and background on General Hospital see the following:
Mayor Megan Barry announces plan to end Nashville General inpatient care
Metro General Hospital is seeking an additional $10 million dollar subsidy from the city.
General Hospital request for additional subsidy jumps from $10 Million to $16 Million.
Metro General seeks $7.5M more, on top of a recent $10M more, on top of the budgeted $33.5M subsidy.
How the Mayoral candidates would address Metro General Hospital. None of them impress me.
Top Stories
Wednesday, August 30, 2017
Mayor Barry's attack against a basic statement of Evangelical Christian belief
By David French, National Review, August 30, 2017- Don’t ever forget that, for some folks, “separation of church and state” is a half-measure. It’s just a pit stop on the road to de-Christianizing America. It’s a temporary means to a much bigger end. Over the weekend, I was honored to sign a document called the Nashville Statement. It’s a basic declaration of Christian orthodoxy on sexuality, sexual orientation, and sexual identity. Its 14 articles can be boiled down to a simple statement: We believe the Bible is the word of God, and the word of God declares that sexual intimacy is reserved for the lifelong union of a man and a woman in marriage. It acknowledges the reality of same-sex attraction as well as the reality of transgender self-conceptions, but denies that God sanctions same-sex sexual activity or a transgendered self-conception that is at odds with biological reality. In other words, it’s basic Christianity.
.... Barry’s statement, however, is different. It’s not separation of church and state, it’s a declaration of state against church. (link)
NASHVILLE, TN (WSMV) -The Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood has created the “Nashville Statement,” stating that marriage is between one man and one woman. ... Barry tweeted Tuesday morning that the “so-called ‘Nashville Statement’ is poorly named and does not represent the inclusive values of the city & people of Nashville.”
Below is the text of the Nashville Statement. To see the source material and a complete list of initial signatories, follow this link.
Evangelical Christians at the dawn of the twenty-first century find themselves living in a period of historic transition. As Western culture has become increasingly post-Christian, it has embarked upon a massive revision of what it means to be a human being. By and large the spirit of our age no longer discerns or delights in the beauty of God’s design for human life. Many deny that God created human beings for his glory, and that his good purposes for us include our personal and physical design as male and female. It is common to think that human identity as male and female is not part of God’s beautiful plan, but is, rather, an expression of an individual’s autonomous preferences. The pathway to full and lasting joy through God’s good design for his creatures is thus replaced by the path of shortsighted alternatives that, sooner or later, ruin human life and dishonor God. This secular spirit of our age presents a great challenge to the Christian church. Will the church of the Lord Jesus Christ lose her biblical conviction, clarity, and courage, and blend into the spirit of the age? Or will she hold fast to the word of life, draw courage from Jesus, and unashamedly proclaim his way as the way of life? Will she maintain her clear, counter-cultural witness to a world that seems bent on ruin? We are persuaded that faithfulness in our generation means declaring once again the true story of the world and of our place in it—particularly as male and female. Christian Scripture teaches that there is but one God who alone is Creator and Lord of all. To him alone, every person owes gladhearted thanksgiving, heart-felt praise, and total allegiance. This is the path not only of glorifying God, but of knowing ourselves. To forget our Creator is to forget who we are, for he made us for himself. And we cannot know ourselves truly without truly knowing him who made us. We did not make ourselves. We are not our own. Our true identity, as male and female persons, is given by God. It is not only foolish, but hopeless, to try to make ourselves what God did not create us to be. We believe that God’s design for his creation and his way of salvation serve to bring him the greatest glory and bring us the greatest good. God’s good plan provides us with the greatest freedom. Jesus said he came that we might have life and have it in overflowing measure. He is for us and not against us. Therefore, in the hope of serving Christ’s church and witnessing publicly to the good purposes of God for human sexuality revealed in Christian Scripture, we offer the following affirmations and denials.
Article 1
WE AFFIRM that God has designed marriage to be a covenantal, sexual, procreative, lifelong union of one man and one woman, as husband and wife, and is meant to signify the covenant love between Christ and his bride the church. WE DENY that God has designed marriage to be a homosexual, polygamous, or polyamorous relationship. We also deny that marriage is a mere human contract rather than a covenant made before God.
Article 2
WE AFFIRM that God’s revealed will for all people is chastity outside of marriage and fidelity within marriage. WE DENY that any affections, desires, or commitments ever justify sexual intercourse before or outside marriage; nor do they justify any form of sexual immorality.
Article 3
WE AFFIRM that God created Adam and Eve, the first human beings, in his own image, equal before God as persons, and distinct as male and female. WE DENY that the divinely ordained differences between male and female render them unequal in dignity or worth.
Article 4
WE AFFIRM that divinely ordained differences between male and female reflect God’s original creation design and are meant for human good and human flourishing. WE DENY that such differences are a result of the Fall or are a tragedy to be overcome.
Article 5
WE AFFIRM that the differences between male and female reproductive structures are integral to God’s design for self-conception as male or female. WE DENY that physical anomalies or psychological conditions nullify the God-appointed link between biological sex and self-conception as male or female.
Article 6
WE AFFIRM that those born with a physical disorder of sex development are created in the image of God and have dignity and worth equal to all other image-bearers. They are acknowledged by our Lord Jesus in his words about “eunuchs who were born that way from their mother's womb.” With all others they are welcome as faithful followers of Jesus Christ and should embrace their biological sex insofar as it may be known. WE DENY that ambiguities related to a person’s biological sex render one incapable of living a fruitful life in joyful obedience to Christ.
Article 7
WE AFFIRM that self-conception as male or female should be defined by God’s holy purposes in creation and redemption as revealed in Scripture. WE DENY that adopting a homosexual or transgender self-conception is consistent with God’s holy purposes in creation and redemption.
Article 8
WE AFFIRM that people who experience sexual attraction for the same sex may live a rich and fruitful life pleasing to God through faith in Jesus Christ, as they, like all Christians, walk in purity of life. WE DENY that sexual attraction for the same sex is part of the natural goodness of God’s original creation, or that it puts a person outside the hope of the gospel.
Article 9
WE AFFIRM that sin distorts sexual desires by directing them away from the marriage covenant and toward sexual immorality— a distortion that includes both heterosexual and homosexual immorality. WE DENY that an enduring pattern of desire for sexual immorality justifies sexually immoral behavior.
Article 10
WE AFFIRM that it is sinful to approve of homosexual immorality or transgenderism and that such approval constitutes an essential departure from Christian faithfulness and witness. WE DENY that the approval of homosexual immorality or transgenderism is a matter of moral indifference about which otherwise faithful Christians should agree to disagree.
Article 11
WE AFFIRM our duty to speak the truth in love at all times, including when we speak to or about one another as male or female. WE DENY any obligation to speak in such ways that dishonor God’s design of his imagebearers as male and female.
Article 12
WE AFFIRM that the grace of God in Christ gives both merciful pardon and transforming power, and that this pardon and power enable a follower of Jesus to put to death sinful desires and to walk in a manner worthy of the Lord. WE DENY that the grace of God in Christ is insufficient to forgive all sexual sins and to give power for holiness to every believer who feels drawn into sexual sin.
Article 13
WE AFFIRM that the grace of God in Christ enables sinners to forsake transgender selfconceptions and by divine forbearance to accept the God-ordained link between one’s biological sex and one’s self-conception as male or female. WE DENY that the grace of God in Christ sanctions self-conceptions that are at odds with God’s revealed will.
Article 14
WE AFFIRM that Christ Jesus has come into the world to save sinners and that through Christ’s death and resurrection forgiveness of sins and eternal life are available to every person who repents of sin and trusts in Christ alone as Savior, Lord, and supreme treasure. WE DENY that the Lord’s arm is too short to save or that any sinner is beyond his reach.
On on Friday June 26, 2015, At-large Metro Councilwoman Megan Barry, a Nashville mayoral candidate, performed the first same sex wedding in Tennessee. |
Top Stories